-
• #3227
eh? why not use a b&w film and be able to do enlargements? is it just for convenience? and do you actually get decent contrast? do you have to do lots of digital post-processing?
questions questions
It all gets drum scanned hi-res and ends up in Adobe Lightroom.
Sacrilege?
meh.
-
• #3228
If those night shots are with flash then 100iso will be fine... .
Sorry miro_o, but that goes against everything I have learned about photography, in more than 30 years.
If you equate INDOOR Photography to NIGHT Photography, then I understand your recommendation. However, night photography is often taken to mean outdoor photography....at night. Therefore I couldn't recommend 100 ASA/ISO film for night work.....unless using a sturdy tripod and a cable-release.
Better to use a 400-1000 speed film at night outdoors. I'd go for a 400 myself. Of course its grainy, so you lose definition, but you gain that back in faster shutter speeds or wider apertures. That's my take on it anyway.
-
• #3229
I'm sorry to hear that.
Night time photography:
- Long exposure – use low iso film such as iso 100 (as it helps avoid reciprocity failure).
- Flash – use whatever depending on how much of the scene you want lit, I use fill-in and 100 iso as this avoids overexposed areas that can't be brought back.
- Outside with streetlights etc. Then you want a fast film, maybe.
Two out of three means I win.
:)
- Long exposure – use low iso film such as iso 100 (as it helps avoid reciprocity failure).
-
• #3230
Diacord received today (Royal Mail working on a Sunday?).
Very happy with it.
Thanks Spenceey.Blimey only posted on Friday!
-
• #3231
Blimey only posted on Friday!
Yeah, Royal Mail in efficiency shocker!
Your packaging was very novel, wondered what it was at first!
-
• #3232
Ah so that was one of the Christmas wrapped ones?
Figured it's Christmas time you might want to put it under the tree for yourself!
-
• #3233
I'm actually giving it to my gf for christmas, I thought about leaving it wrapped up but wanted to see what it was like before I gave it to her and I did stuff like took the finder off and the mirror out and cleaned it and stuff.
Kinda want to keep it myself actually!
-
• #3234
Blimey you did a good job of cleaning it up then. TLR's are lovely cameras to look at.
-
• #3235
Double-X | D96
My neck of the woods.
-
• #3236
North Six Shooter, Indian Creek, Utah.
Olympus OM1, Velvia?
The scan is gash - got a bunch of other shots that aren't fixable. They project fine but the scans are terrible. -
• #3237
XA2 turned up Spence, going to have a quick look now. Ta
-
• #3238
Brilliant. Hope the case is ok too. Fits the XA2 and flash perfectly.
-
• #3239
In ways I actually prefer the XA2 because it doesn't have a rangefinder. So quick for shooting on and still so small, especially without the flash on.
Get some film through it Mac!
-
• #3240
-
• #3241
Some new shots on me blerrg.
http://imdabestmayne.tumblr.com/ -
• #3242
In ways I actually prefer the XA2 because it doesn't have a rangefinder. So quick for shooting on and still so small, especially without the flash on.
Get some film through it Mac!
Exactly, I sold my XA because it didn't really fill a gap so to speak. Liking the simplicity of the XA2, just put some Tri-x in!
-
• #3243
Sacrilege?
not all. jealous of drum scans though.
MetroLandman - you live in Dungeness?
-
• #3244
Some new shots on me blerrg.
http://imdabestmayne.tumblr.com/You've been proper busy, Andy. I'm particularly liking the 'big' shots. Are you back in Scotland yet?
-
• #3246
That might be down to what colour profile you are saving your images as.
-
• #3247
You were right Taxi, I'd just forgotten to embed the colour profile when saving the image.
-
• #3248
Brilliant. Hope the case is ok too.....
Cheers spenceey, I received the Bessa yesterday, and the case is perfect. My twin in Canada is well jealous. Perfect little prezzie to myself.
-
• #3249
You were right Taxi, I'd just forgotten to embed the colour profile when saving the image.
I've had loads of issues with colours and flickr. I know it's down to profiles but there's so many variables in there (embed in jpg, browsers, flickr etc) that I just gave up flickr completely. The shit interface didn't aid them either.
-
• #3250
My take on 'Hurricane Bawbag'
IMG_0004 by Ande Murdoch, on Flickr
IMG_0002 by Ande Murdoch, on Flickr
IMG by Ande Murdoch, on Flickr
If it were me then I'd probably be using ektar as a colour negative (100 iso), or portra at 400.
Black and white Fuji neopan acros (100) or ilford delta 400, or of course HP5 for grainy high contrast stuff.