-
• #602
From the comments it appears that most donors got the joke but a couple may find that they rushed to give money to the odious woman.
The reality is that the publicity from the case probably benefits both of them in the long run. Really pleased for Jack Monroe. Not so for Hopkins.
-
• #603
I hope she loses a libel case and has to pay out a shit load of money.
-
• #604
LOL. Donated. :D
-
• #605
I hope she sharts herself just after takeoff on a long haul flight.
-
• #606
I hope there's just enough floss to snap through the tight bits between her teeth and slash her gums so that she is in pain for the rest of the week.
-
• #607
Looks like she may get sued by Jack Monroe again.
-
• #608
Sorry for the deviation but this made me laugh:
SOUTHEND MAN ASKS TATTOOIST FOR ‘THAT GUY FROM THE JAM’ AND IT ALL GOES HORRIBLY WRONG
-
• #609
-
• #610
Flies on You, from a couple of years ago:
https://youtu.be/w3W69M5RXRU
-
• #611
Why?
-
• #612
called her a foodblogger and denied her legitimate aspirations to be considered 'simply human'
i would argue that all fucking day long to try and squeeze another £whatever grand out of the cunt.
-
• #613
Andrea Catherwood does a good job here:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b08hl5s7
Hopkins is pretty gross for no reason at 8:20, Catherwood just plays it with a straight bat and then probes pretty robustly to get a straight answer.
The thing is, Hopkins re-tweeted this:
and said "You couldn't make it up!" Except someone did. Of course that sign's made-up, but Hopkins re-tweeted it because she's not just a gobshite, she's a thick, nasty racist bellend.
-
• #614
bellend
clithood, please, let's be properly gender specific.
bellend won't work here, you fascist.
-
• #615
Hopkins is saying that Monroe blackmailed her.
-
• #616
Really?
That's interesting because she asked for a simple apology first.
That would surely have ended it?
It was only after Hopkins refused to apologise and admit she was wrong that JM suggested a charity donation might be better.
I can't see how it was blackmail.
-
• #617
I'm only reporting what I see on Twitter, I may be both wrong and incapable of explaining what I see
-
• #618
I think that's true for everyone.
-
• #619
she's a thick, nasty racist bellend.
She's not thick. She's one of the rare cases of unpleasantness that can't be explained through lack of brains.
-
• #620
She has appealed.
I was going to write "She is appealling"; but she isn't.
-
• #621
she's certainly gullible. which is redolent of thickitude.
-
• #622
Thinking road signs in Leeds have arabic translations is pretty thick.
-
• #623
Yeah. Or something. Edited :)
-
• #624
She didn't turn up to any of the court sessions re the libel, does this harm her appeal?
-
• #625
No. What may have harmed her case was her refusal to give evidence and therefore open herself to cross examination but there is no need for a paty to be present. Sometimes it is an advantage not to have them there.
😂