-
• #13877
Yes it... oh wait
They were like
"brexit brexit something something cherries"
IIRC :)
-
• #13878
No, it's not.
Yes, it really is, Oliver - read it: https://labour.org.uk/manifesto/negotiating-brexit/
EDIT: you've just cherry-picked the manifesto, awesome.
How about this bit, that makes the rest a Unicorn parade?
"Freedom of movement will end when we leave the European Union."
You can have your own opinion, but not your own facts.
-
• #13879
I have just quoted the text in full. There is nothing in there whatsoever that advocates a 'hard "Brexit"' and a lot that explicitly rejects one.
-
• #13880
Partition the country. London, NI, Wales & Scotland are the Remain state, let's call it Anglo-Celtistan. The rump of England can Leave, they can still call themselves England which will keep every gammon happy. Everyone has 12 months to migrate to their abode of choice before the hard borders go up. What could possibly go wrong
-
• #13881
Apart from what the EU have been saying since the referendum.
I agree, if you ignore that, then you are correct.
-
• #13882
I have just quoted the text in full. There is nothing in there whatsoever that advocates a 'hard "Brexit"' and a lot that explicitly rejects one.
1 Attachment
-
• #13883
EDIT: you've just cherry-picked the manifesto, awesome.
Er? I've quoted the exact same link as you.
Now you're cherry-picking a bit. :)
How about this bit, that makes the rest a Unicorn parade?
"Freedom of movement will end when we leave the European Union."
I explained just that bit recently:
https://www.lfgss.com/comments/14415600/
(I don't read all of this thread at all times, either.)
-
• #13884
Your previous post was pure sophistry, Oliver.
The manifesto says "Freedom of movement will end when we leave the European Union."
That dictates a hard brexit, unless of course the EU have been lying all this time.
-
• #13885
Oops, sorry, confused again by the images they put in between the bits of text. I thought the page ended there, even though I'd been there before. It doesn't matter, though, as there's nothing about a 'hard "Brexit"' on the rest of the page, either.
-
• #13886
You are not telling the truth, Oliver. If you have any familiarity with what the EU have said, consistently throughout the whole process you will be aware that the Labour Manifesto ask for cake, and it cannot have cake.
-
• #13887
That seems a little naive. A great deal is achieved via cross-party working, and it seems reasonable to expect elected officials to understand how to be effective while on the wrong side of parliamentary arithmetic. For a party to abandon all hope of influencing the course of events simply because it is in opposition is nonsensical. If that was the case then there would be little point in having an opposition until the end of an electoral cycle. And even then you might expect the incumbents to stand a greater chance of staying in power by virtue of the opposition having had too little visibility to make an impact during the term of the parliament. Fortunately, Labour looks like it might be beginning wake up from its navel-gazing torpor, so perhaps we might start to see some progress.
-
• #13888
Your previous post was pure sophistry, Oliver.
No.
The manifesto says "Freedom of movement will end when we leave the European Union."
That dictates a hard brexit, unless of course the EU have been lying all this time.
It doesn't, no. My previous post on the issue stands.
-
• #13889
Or just vote for what you think is right and hope enough other people do the same thing, because that's how democracy works?
I would assume you'd agree with the majority of the Lib Dem manifesto to vote for them though? Not just their stance on Brexit? Because if not, no, that's not how democracy should work, although I agree that in some cases this is how it misfires.
And if you did agree with the majority of it, then you probably wouldn't agree with the majority of Labour's manifesto I'd have thought, so why consider voting for them in the first place?
This is why I reckon on poll day the majority of the 'not voting for Labour cause brexit' will have to admit that they are the least worst option and vote for them any way.
Time to be alive etc.
-
• #13890
My previous post on the issue stands.
You are, demonstrably, wrong.
-
• #13891
You are not telling the truth, Oliver.
Ha.
If you have any familiarity with what the EU have said, consistently throughout the whole process you will be aware that the Labour Manifesto ask for cake, and it cannot have cake.
Of course. That doesn't dictate a 'hard "Brexit"', though. As I've previously asked about and subsequently concluded, I don't think Labour really have a plan the EU would find acceptable, either. It still doesn't dictate a 'hard "Brexit"', it just means that a putative Labour government approached the EU with this idea, they would probably run up against a brick wall just like Theresa May has done. Theresa May hasn't triggered a hard 'Brexit' yet, so why would Labour?
Clutching at straws with this sentence doesn't change the fact that there are plenty of things in there that explicitly rule out a hard 'Brexit': rejection of a 'no deal' scenario, etc.
-
• #13892
You are, demonstrably, wrong.
Let others decide on that. Perhaps my sophistry will dazzle and persuade them.
-
• #13893
Sophistry is always pure, like enquiries are always full and shock is always total.
-
• #13894
All right, my pure sophistry, then.
-
• #13896
So is there any pathway which does not lead to a Mad Max hard Brexit?
-
• #13897
Clutching at straws with this sentence
Clutching at straws now means "to take at face value"?
I completely retract my accusation of Sophistry Oliver, you can speak only the unvarnished truth.
-
• #13898
I'm probably somewhere between lib dem and labour on most things, but I think that brexit is a big enough issue to be decisive.
The "everyone will vote labour" point assumes that brexit is just another issue like anything else. I don't think it is, I think it's more important.
-
• #13899
But "Labour will always put jobs and the economy first" so Labour must prove any non-Remain option is better than Remaining in terms of impact on jobs and the economy.
This manifesto is a mess.
-
• #13900
How can a hard Brexit fulfill the six tests explicitly put forward by Labour?
Does it ensure a strong and collaborative future relationship with the EU? Does it deliver the “exact same benefits” as we currently have as members of the Single Market and Customs Union? Does it ensure the fair management of migration in the interests of the economy and communities? Does it defend rights and protections and prevent a race to the bottom? Does it protect national security and our capacity to tackle cross-border crime? Does it deliver for all regions and nations of the UK?
It seems unusual to me that anyone would imagine the Conservatives - the party that openly allows for (and in many cases calls for) a hard Brexit - become the party of remain, and Labour - the party which has explicitly come out against - become the party of hard Brexit.
No, it's not.
https://labour.org.uk/manifesto/negotiating-brexit/