-
• #32952
Podium ceremony done. WVA won
-
• #32953
If Pidcock wasn’t on a 49cm frame he would have won that
-
• #32954
-
• #32955
Aaah. Unlucky Pidcock. Gutted.
-
• #32956
Four one thousandths of a second in it apparently.
If he hadn’t wasted energy running his 13.26 5km, he’s had won that.
-
• #32957
Longer wheelbase...
-
• #32958
Shoulda chucked his water bottle. That would have been the four one thousandths....
-
• #32959
Former dutch champion? Could be anyone ;)
-
• #32960
Brilliant.
-
• #32961
Choose the right line in a cyclocross for the edge over the competition.
-
• #32962
Surely it's the left line?
-
• #32963
May be a stupid question, but is throwing the bike at the line actually faster than sprinting through the line?
-
• #32964
I would think so as the speed of the riders is almost the same and shoving the bars forward puts some extra speed on top of that
-
• #32965
Ta, just thought I'd ask, suppose they wouldn't do it if it didn't give any benefit.
-
• #32966
Call me odd. But at some point it should just be a draw, right? Reckon that should have been. Great race!
I don't think technology has made everything* better.
*anything
-
• #32967
I’d have given it to Pidcock on umpire’s call.
-
• #32968
Pidcock for knighthood !
-
• #32970
Who know, skinny isn't listed under finish judge!
-
• #32971
Pidcock shoulda listened to LUFGSS and ridden 28s
-
• #32972
Doesn’t Flèche Wallone suit Pidcock better than Amstel gold?
-
• #32973
unlucky are pidders
-
• #32974
Obvs Pidcock is ripping up trees right now but is he in any of the GT squads for Ineos?
-
• #32975
Doubt it. He's got Olympic MTB on his schedule instead.
I guess he could do a vuelta but that wouldn't make sense for CX
Innit. I’d balanced my snoozing and semi-conscious awareness of the commentary perfectly too.