-
• #127
For 2011?
-
• #128
Nope, too short notice... we'd need every scene/country to elect a representative to start seriously debating the finer points of the idea (Euros body mailing list on Google). We'd then get something up and running for 2012 I reckon?
It all depends if people think it's a good approach or not though, hence the need for an initial discussion with time for the representatives to talk to everyone in their scene about it and report back, etc.
-
• #129
yeah.
IMO it could be cool to know ASAP who gonna organize WHBPC 2012. Like this, the other city who lost the bidding process can pretend to organize a major tourney for qualfication. -
• #130
i like the idea of Jono's. Of course it would all get washed and we can see how much of it stays , but it's a good point to start.
-
• #131
i seem to find this extremely confusing, maybe it's the bullet points, either i'm losing my mind or i have blindness to this. I really don't get it...
-
• #132
don't try to clarify it for me either i'm aware it's my own failing i just thought you should how thick i am right now.
-
• #133
Rather than having country qualification tournaments (like the UK champs) and arbitrary city/country allocations of spots, you would have to get your team to one of four qualifying tournaments (in N, E, S and W Europe). The podium teams (probably down to 8th place or so) from these four tournaments would then be asked to come to the Euros, with the other spots being nabbed by teams during a prelim tourney (like Berlin).
You could even compete at each of the four tournaments (or not) to increase your chances, but if you won more than 1 spot at the Euros it would be passed down to the next best team, etc (managed by the European body with complete transparency of the decision-making process).
This would allow you to team up with anyone (including internationally mixed teams) and does away with any nationality/origin confusion. I also believe that Americans, etc, should be welcomed to the event (if they can afford the flights). We are essentially a big muddle of individuals anyway and bike polo is not going to be supported/recognised nationally any time soon, so why not skip that step and organise a European wide solution straight away?
-
• #134
^i like this
-
• #135
I like the idea Jono
-
• #136
yep, 2012, do that.
-
• #137
bang on! yes yes sounds good...2012 this would rock!
-
• #138
Pretty sweet, go to the first one, if you don't qualify, go to the 2nd, and so on, until you get in. If you don't, at least you had lots of chances. Can't be fairer than that.
-
• #139
We are essentially a big muddle of individuals anyway and bike polo is not going to be supported/recognised nationally any time soon, so why not skip that step and organise a European wide solution straight away?
Just to play Devil's Advocate, would this not hamper the opportunities for national recognition in the future ?
If the sport is seen to be European in set up, the chances of us attracting interest from UK based agencies may be reduced.Just putting that out there.
-
• #140
What are these UK Based agencies ?
-
• #141
The UK Border Agency?
-
• #142
British Cycling
-
• #143
UK Sport
-
• #144
If polo is BC recognised, doping will be illegal, lame.
-
• #145
Ha, Chukker would be fucked
-
• #146
The London international polo team would be reduced to locket and James Aufbruch.
-
• #147
IMO it could be cool to know ASAP who gonna organize WHBPC 2012.
Surely London... Olympic year and all that.
-
• #148
Haha.
I like the NA/Jono/four qualifying tournies plan.
-
• #149
Devils advocate:
Would this not risk turning the sport into a game that only the financially and time rich can play?
-
• #150
1) you gots ta pay to get to the worlds/euros anyway.
2) four tournies that are geographically distanced should mitigate this.
i like this..