-
• #52
eh?
-
• #53
f yes:
5.2>How many spots should be allocated;
A; All of them
B; Half of them
C; Top 1 only
D; Top 2 only
E; Top 3 onlyok, seeing as there is definitely going to be 1 or more, all those people who want 'none' will be voting for 1 (or wont vote at all)
the rest of the votes will be split amongst the others
i was just thinking out loud for those people who want 'all' or 'half' or three' - anything that is 'more than 1' basically - they'd be better off all voting for a 'more than 1 option'
-
• #54
Sorry to disagree Hops but there have been a number of people who have been nothing but negative whilst I've been putting my own time into sorting this out.
I concur with Rik's statement.
Gabes had been asking for someone to step up and do it for 3 weeks+ by the time I got involved. Something that I only did as I want to play some decent polo.
Additionally, for all of those who couldn't be bothered to step up because of the time this takes, I'd like to point out that I've packed, moved house and unpacked all whilst organising this.
I agree with Rik's sentiment, just not in relation to what's happening in this thread. What's more, Rik is not clean of the shit he's throwing, and it's not very helpful - he is just adding to the top of it.
And you have had help with these polls Em. James, John H, and Max have all helped to get the ball rolling, and keep it rolling. And just in the discussions we've seen a lot of stuff get hashed out and made clearer, which is a group effort.
Of course, you have probably taken then brunt of work, but being disparaging to the community is a bit harsh.
-
• #55
I wasn't being disparaging to the people who have helped. I was being disparaging to the few people who have sat back and done nothing whilst making snide remarks wherever they can.
James, Max, Pique for their work on the rules should be commended.
John H has gone above and beyond.
You and Gabes have done all the admin shite that I can't do with minimal fuss and in quick time. -
• #56
For the sake of clarity I'm talking in relation to all of the v.3 threads, not just this one.
-
• #57
For the sake of clarity I'm talking in relation to all of the v.3 threads, not just this one.
+1
(i.e., not necessarily talking to or about you. I think our points are the same).
-
• #58
Agreed.
I assume that everyone who voted 'no' will be voting for '1'
as anyone who votes '2' or '3' or '4' or 'all', could also be '2 or more'
i.e those who want '3' would be better of voting '2' as anyone who wants more than 1 will be split.