-
• #1077
I'm genuinely interested to see how it turns out
-
• #1078
Any lo pros in the 54/55/56 size area, sell them to me!
-
• #1079
Sumo asked me if I'd taken this pic yet, and I hadn't....so here goes:
It's a lot closer than I expected!
Out of interest, what's the white saddle...?
-
• #1080
Carrera. not very special.
-
• #1081
Thanks. Just looked an interesting shape from that angle.
-
• #1083
Nice girl representin'
-
• #1084
saddle angle>>>
-
• #1085
Bar angle >>>
-
• #1086
Foot retention >>>
-
• #1087
spds <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
no cleats >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
-
• #1088
The fact that it's not a low pro >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
-
• #1089
Not taking primary position on road >>>
-
• #1090
Possibly a man haha?>>>>>>>>>>>
-
• #1091
I heard you liek lo-pros ...
NOS Somec with Columbus EGO tubing ... i guess it's from the mid nineties. Has XL91 stamped in the BB, but I don't think EGO was around in '91.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/50788096@N02/sets/72157629676782034/
-
• #1092
Sex wee, Oh my days! What size is that seat tube?
-
• #1093
57cm ctt
-
• #1094
And tt (virtual and actual)? I might fit it.....
-
• #1095
saddle angle>>>
Bar angle >>>
Foot retention >>>
spds <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
no cleats >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Not taking primary position on road >>>
and the worst crime of all
RED TROUSERS -
• #1097
-
• #1098
Fuck me sideways. And a 24" too..
-
• #1099
Poor frame and wheels though...
-
• #1100
I heard you liek lo-pros ...
NOS Somec with Columbus EGO tubing ... i guess it's from the mid nineties. Has XL91 stamped in the BB, but I don't think EGO was around in '91.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/50788096@N02/sets/72157629676782034/
Almost as good as my Tommasini ;)
Can't wait to take one of those photos with the mash.. That'll learn yas!