-
• #14602
Thought he was banned already, he's CLP's sockie isn't he?
-
• #14603
can we get the hammer dropped on this little turd for sending threatening PMs?
tar
If he has made threats of physical violence then yes.
But you'll need to forward the PM to me in it's entirety so that I can prove you didn't edit it, and that the sender said it. Then, if a threat exists he will be banned.
-
• #14604
Thought he was banned already, he's CLP's sockie isn't he?
He's not banned, and CLP was only temp banned for 3 days in effort to spare himself from the fallout of his failure to control his rage.
-
• #14605
Please share the PM with us publicly too.
-
• #14606
sphinx has been permanently banned for making physical threats and inviting someone to fight him.
-
• #14607
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 7 (6 members and 1 guests)
dancing james*, greenhell, sphinx -
• #14608
cheers boss.
-
• #14609
james.
Quit with the shit stirring. You are not helping yourself recently.
-
• #14610
Well in.
-
• #14611
If he has made threats of physical violence then yes.
But you'll need to forward the PM to me in it's entirety so that I can prove you didn't edit it, and that the sender said it. Then, if a threat exists he will be banned.
Can I ask why, when I bought the matter up of pm threats of physical violence, that the same didn't happen?
-
• #14612
Because big cats are assumed capable of looking after themselves?
-
• #14613
I was neither the sender, nor the recipient of the threats.
-
• #14614
Can I ask why, when I bought the matter up of pm threats of physical violence, that the same didn't happen?
Because this, perhaps?
So sending threats by PM. What is the score?
For the hard of thinking, where do I say I am anything to do with the PMs. All I have asked is what the score is.
For the record I have not received the PM and I did not send the PM. I would liek to know what the protocol is.
Just guessing.
-
• #14615
Velocio has already answered this question, way back when you first got a stick up your arse about it.
Private messages are private and I cannot access to them.
Allegations are just that and I don't ban people based on hearsay.
The only way that the threats will be reacted to is if the entirety of the PM is shared.
When that happens, standard forum rules apply.
All that said, if the threat is part of a tit-for-tat I'd come down heavily on both parties.
In essence: Name and shame, and if it's bad enough they'll get banned too. If it's part of a tit-for-tat you both get yourselves banned.
Why does he then need to explain it to you, again, after he's already done so?
You didn't report anything, you just made vague insinuations about somebody, somewhere, receiving 'threats' from someone.
-
• #14616
You can nerg me again now.
-
• #14617
If he has made threats of physical violence then yes.
But you'll need to forward the PM to me in it's entirety so that I can prove you didn't edit it, and that the sender said it. Then, if a threat exists he will be banned.
Velocio has already answered this question, way back when you first got a stick up your arse about it.
Why does he then need to explain it to you, again, after he's already done so?
You didn't report anything, you just made vague insinuations about somebody, somewhere, receiving 'threats' from someone.
Notice a difference?
-
• #14618
No, but I can change it to:
Dosnoventa frame - MKS nuevo pedals - NJS straps - 3T post - FSA bars
Thanks muchly :)
-
• #14619
Notice a difference?
There is no difference, you fucking idiot.
"The only way that the threats will be reacted to is if the entirety of the PM is shared."
That's from VB's original response to you. How is that a difference? I understand that perhaps your reading comprehension isn't quite at the level one might expect from a solicitor, say, or a doctor, but surely even you can spot that Velocio said to both you and greenhell that he wouldn't do anything unless the OMGTHREATPM was forwarded to him?
-
• #14620
don't bring me into this. i feel bad enough as it is.
-
• #14621
For fuck's sake, all of you, stop being such fuckwits and ride your fucking goddamn bicycles.
Or jerk off, or go have a pint or a coffee, or whatever the fuck makes you happy.
Lynx- what you've posted makes no sense- I hope you can understand that.
VB will act upon shared (even privately to just him, to prevent the cluster-wank of forum hormones that appear whenever some poor fuck slightly diverges from the mean. I'm as guilty as the rest of you and that makes me angry as all hell with myself.And the rest of you, stop being petty little fucks- I don't have a fucking clue if lynx fabricates his own special narrative, but if that is the case, feel pity for him, don't offer vitriol- that's playground behaviour.
How the shit you deal with this all V.B. I don't fucking know.
/rant.
- It should be noted that I am not condoning any of this threatening behaviour- that's as puerile as it gets, and frankly if you're getting that worked up over something on the internet, you should probably have good hard look at your insignificant failure of a life.
- It should be noted that I am not condoning any of this threatening behaviour- that's as puerile as it gets, and frankly if you're getting that worked up over something on the internet, you should probably have good hard look at your insignificant failure of a life.
-
• #14622
^ what's important is you've found a way to feel superior to everyone etc.
-
• #14623
Yeah, because that is totally my style.
Fuck all you little fucks. You'll never be on my fucking level.Truthfully, though you have a point.
But it wasn't intended in that way.
Considering how quick to react and not think I am.
And how swayed I can be by a group.
All in all- I'm the biggest cunt.Ps. I hope you enjoyed feeling superior to me. Because your little snide comment plays along the same lines...
And so it goes on, for on the fleas there are fleas that bite 'em and so on, ad infinitum.... -
• #14624
he even said something uncharitable about DJ.
I'm the biggest cunt.
Pretty sure this now means greenhell has to fight eyebrows.
-
• #14625
+1