Time travel thread, Hey ho let's go!

i'm going to apply occam's razor:

nobody really understands magnetism or gravity on this thread.

if you were to produce 'something' akin to a magnet...however not as simple as a household magnet (because the earths field fluctuates, so you would need to be able to change its frequency) that was in tune with the earth...ie 440hz...you would be able to make it fall slower...as it would be able to repel the field...

Is there anywhere I could read more about this idea ?

I really can't be arsed to google occam's razor, pascal's wanger or schroedinger's cat. I just can't. Then I'll be all interested and I'll miss funny stuff on here.

occam's razor: if it's a conspiracy theory or alternative medicine or "woooh" it's wrong.

Is there anywhere I could read more about this idea ?

Stephen Hawking's Universe: The Cosmos Explained: Amazon.co.uk: David Filkin: Books

So basically, there is no going back, only going forwards slower or faster.

Thanks for all that, I think I understood at least some of it !!

occam's razor: if it's a conspiracy theory or alternative medicine or "woooh" it's wrong.

Ummm ... okayyy

anyway, you missed Pascal's wanger ... I made a funny!

did you?

it's a pity we can't go back in time. maybe i'd have caught it with a bit of warning.

nobody really understands magnetism or gravity on this thread.

It's a bunch of cunts in a bun fight... LFGSS business as usual...

Pascal's wager ... oh never mind.

So the earth is vibrating in the key of A? Someone help me out here?

if i had a time machine i'd go back in time having attended school and studied time travel phyiscs and mechanics and then explain it properly.

No,..I said that actually gravity (or the standard account of gravity, which is that a body spins and therefore 'produces' 'gravity'...is secondary or a by product of the earth spinning, the earth is spinning because it has two opposing poles, and as they are equal to each other, although they fluctuate this in itself causes the spin...not 'gravity'....

The standard account of gravity, which is that...??!!!? no. it. isn't. The standard Newtonian account of gravity is that things with mass create gravitational fields around themselves that attract other things with mass according to the inverse square law. No spinning. No magnetism. The General Relativity version is that mass distorts the geometry of spacetime so that masses accelerate towards one another (thus explaining the coincidence between mass as a measure of inertia, and mass as gravitational 'charge'). No spinning. No magnetism. Quantum mechanics doesn't cope well with gravity which is partly why people are so interested in observing the Higgs boson as that might give some clues as to how to fit gravity and QM together.

Faraday had the idea that maybe there was some connection between gravity and magnetism. So he did some experiments. And concluded that there isn't.

So the earth is vibrating in the key of A? Someone help me out here?

no, stevie had it in the key of life.

I think Faraday was probably wrong...

didn't bmc make a time machine

No, that was BMMF.

yeah i knew it
don't know what all the fuss about time travel is
http://www.chainreactioncycles.com/Models.aspx?PartnerID=79&ModelID=37717

Epiphany time:

Winged angel you are an idiotic, ill tempered, pious and arrogant cunt, I am wasting my time here, good luck with your shit conspiracy theories.

I don't doubt this post will add to your inerrancy, further proof at how brave outside-the-box thinkers like you fill us corporate brainwashed drones with fear.

You are the only person on this forum I have ever called a cunt (and meant it).

No more questions, you only deserve mockery.

Time Machine Mk1
Only allowed one to go back as far as the 1700's
Time Machine 2's and 3's were more developed and allowed for a wider range of time travel 3 allowing forward transit through time

The standard account of gravity, which is that...??!!!? no. it. isn't. The standard Newtonian account of gravity is that things with mass create gravitational fields around themselves that attract other things with mass according to the inverse square law. No spinning. No magnetism. The General Relativity version is that mass distorts the geometry of spacetime so that masses accelerate towards one another (thus explaining the coincidence between mass as a measure of inertia, and mass as gravitational 'charge'). No spinning. No magnetism. Quantum mechanics doesn't cope well with gravity which is partly why people are so interested in observing the Higgs boson as that might give some clues as to how to fit gravity and QM together.

Faraday had the idea that maybe there was some connection between gravity and magnetism. So he did some experiments. And concluded that there isn't.

Moth, you are an idiot, the Wingedangel has already risen above the benighted views of such scientific riff-raff as Newton and Faraday.

Unlike you Wingedangel dares to think the impossible, Yes..Dare...thats what those that think do. to think outside the box, a hero, a radical, unlike brainwashed idiots like you.

Oh yeah and 9/11 was an inside job. PROVE ME WRONG !!

And chemitrails are used by the NWO to DULL THE MINDS OF THE SHEEPLE LIKE YOU !!!

PROVE ME WRONG !!!!

WAKE UP !!!! you arrogant fool.

I posted a link that actually argues in favour of an ionic-wind effect. Yes it was wikipedia, but it then goes on to post it's references:

References

^ Robinson, M. (1962, May). History of the electric wind. American Journal of Physics, 30(5), 366-372.
^ Robinson, M. (1960, June 8). Movement of Air in the Electric Wind of the Corona Discharge. (AD0262830)

At least the first of these papers appeared in a peer reviewed scientific journal. One that would certainly not approve the statement that the earth's gravity is actually a magnetic field caused by it's rotation. We could test that of course, by submitting such a claim to the journal in question.

I like the ionic wind theory and effect. It is cool and interesting and I have learned something today. No thanks to you, other than by happen chance, I suspect.

El Guapo is right, this is probably a boring conversation for most people reading this, Tynan, edscoble, Sainsbury's Ed, horatio etc excepted. I am more than happy to move this over to a new thread, if you fancy carrying this on?

We can all suck corporate cock, as long as we totally ignore anyone trying to lift the edge of the carpet?

Who do you think got women the vote? was it the crazy bitch that jumped under the race horse?

Fucking hell, you wave a flag that says I'm an independent thinker, I have tattoos...look..that one even says 'fuck'...and all the while postulate that the government would not lie? and I am crazy and misguided for even suggesting such a thing?
They can't utter a sentence about anything, without it being full of shit.
That is all these 'scary' websites tell you...they aren't all lizards in the white house, Do me a favour. Read something, they actually do carry vicarious truths, and unfortunately they stick in the throat. Not all of it is utter bullshit and any attempt to paint them in such a fashion just shows you scared to actually report on the situation with any clarity.

MASHTON - WAKE UP from your government approved COMA. I notice none of your references where written by women ? Why do you think that is ? IS IT PERHPAS BECAUSE THE FEMININE IS ENSLAVED BY THE MASCUINE do some research - you do understand that word don't you ? R - E - A - S - E - R - C - H is it clear enough now or do you want me to make it BIGGER?

I bet you are shitting you pant and throwing your dollies out of your pram, being served a hot slice of TRUTH PIE from a woman, you sexist cunt.

So you still think your slash and burn and rape and eat policy is THE BEST ? Really, do you really think this still - and you shout 'fraud' at me and call me a arrogant sexist pig and just look at you - some think wikipedia is the ultimate source of information (AS if you would even ever check) - i don't supoose you would ever do this would you, OH NO ! Not incoccent little you.

So are you gioing to do some RESEARCH or is that a bit too 'scary' for you.

Anyhoe I am going out right now so feel free to argue with your little TV brainwashed pals.

x