Please report dangerous drivers to the police - Roadsafe. Report to plod, not just whinge here.

look at his little piggy, spit flecked face. look at it!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vDvrkJkCdJg

What a silly person.

I'm never a violent person but I would've found it very hard not to smash his face in with my d lock if that was me.

Yeah, I might do a little registered keeper search to tomorrow, this little bonage suit wearing gimp deserves to be named and shamed.

What @duckland said.

What a dick.

http://road.cc/content/news/152934-video-road-rage-meltdown-driver-who-threatened-kill-cyclist-fined-public-order

Love this bit of descriptive text: "A second cyclist, not wearing Lycra, tries to calm the situation, with little success. "

With added comedy stills

http://www.richmondandtwickenhamtimes.co.uk/news/13216610.VIDEO___There___s_a_________cycle_lane__I___ll_________kill_you___explosive_row_between_cyclist_and_driver/

Looks like George Galloway to me.

Both leather gimp and cyclist don't exactly come off well; incoherent rage shouting from both... obvs midlife leather crisis was in the wrong the whole way though.
Love the spit flicking prick having a go at the cyclist for what he's wearing though. I mean, come on. Pleather belly-tight jacket, shiny race wheels on a landrover? C'mon little rage man. Have some self-awareness.

pitchforks time

https://twitter.com/brewwells

Don't really think an angry twitter mob is going to make him rethink his attitude.

Some fine PR, it's not like there are any coffee drinking cyclists in SW London.

Nice restraunt to fake book tables at in famous dead cyclists names tho.

Haha, excellent idea.

I already feel sorry for the bloke

I don't.

That threat to eat the cyclist for breakfast seems pretty sincere tho'.

Oh good, a new page to remove any sort of context from my previous post.

Rep.

Are we sure that's the same chap?

I can't get the vidjo on their web site to load but the voice sounds more forrin: http://brew-cafe.com/our-story/

peruses menu

Poached eggs, yoghurt and hot chilli butter with toasted pide? This thread has taken an unexpectedly delicious turn

Yes, but the key point was that a person pushing a bike was deemed to be a pedestrian. It's not that people pushing bikes are allowed to use zebra crossings, the ruling means people pushing bikes should be treated as pedestrians in the context of the Road Traffic Act.

Crank vs Brooks is irrelevant as there wasn't a sign at a zebra crossing. As I understand it the sect 36 of the RTA would take precedence:-

Road Traffic Act 1988

36 Drivers to comply with traffic signs

(1) Where a traffic sign, being a sign—

(a) of the prescribed size, colour and type, or

(b) of another character authorised by the Secretary of State under the provisions in that behalf of the [1984 c. 27.] Road Traffic Regulation Act 1984,

has been lawfully placed on or near a road, a person driving or propelling a vehicle who fails to comply with the indication given by the sign is guilty of an offence.

The definition of "sign" includes traffic lights, and the "propelling a vehicle" is there to prevent people trying to work around it by pushing things past the signs. Note it says "vehicle" rather than "motor vehicle" so it applies to bikes too. In most sections of the RTA (including this one) "drivers " is used to refer to the vehicle operator whether the vehicle has a motor or not, so it continues to applies to cyclists. There are some sections (not this one) of the RTA where things only apply to motor vehicles, but this ain't one of them.

It [dismounting and pushing bikes across junctions through a red light] ain't legal.

http://www.richmondandtwickenhamtimes.co.uk/news/13217611.Extreme_road_rage_driver_identified_as_master_butcher_and_owner_of_upmarket_cafes/