-
• #27
-
• #28
The craze of cycling in London is stupid and dangerous. There are so many clueless fools on the road and or no the paths, I think its a miracle not more people are killed.
And they do ruin places - along the river is the same, loads of wankers riding fast on bikes nearing hitting into little kids and stuff.
-
• #29
you tit
-
• #30
i call shenanigans. whose alias is it? own up.
-
• #31
Don't get me wrong I'm a cyclist, I just don't understant the types of cyclists I mention in the opening post.
-
• #32
Wait, what do vegan's have to do with tis? Call the man a tosser, but lets not drag vegans into it.
-
• #33
Don't get me wrong I'm a cyclist, I just don't understant the types of cyclists I mention in the opening post.
so cyclists are fine as long as they're not riding in parks, or wearing lycra?
what sort of cyclist are you?
-
• #34
someone should take away your cycle
-
• #35
probably half the riders in richmond park were vegans therefore all vegans are tossers.
-
• #36
sub 2k bike... no lycra... he's a fakenger right? especially as he said he was on foot... that means he was pushing his bike... possably because the chain snapped? he's a UNIPACK OWNER
-
• #37
The weekend can be quite bad but it's certainly not unrideable. It's convenient if you live SW and want to do some relatively uninterrupted cycling without having to go further out. It's also a really nice park.
-
• #38
I was walking, since if I want to do some proper riding I'll head out onto proper roads, where proper speeds can be achieved.
I do own lycra, but only because its practical. My argument is that 90 percent of the lycra wearing fools today were fat, slow and obviously unfit. Posers, in other words.
And I have nothing against recreational cyclists, I just dont like it when they ride eratically on pavements nearly hitting small children.
The overall point is that I literally found it hard to see just one ordinary cyclist, only idiots of two different kinds, today.
-
• #39
Though I do have a sub 2k bike - too scared to have anything better. AND I admit at my level it is frankly a waste of money.
Its like having a motorbike that can do 190mph when you ride it around town.
-
• #40
wasn't crazy james and co in richmond park today? if they were all my critique is taken back. richmond park = full of possers!
-
• #41
what a marvellously idiotic post...
-
• #42
possers!
adding that one to the list!
Posser noun, A person who is both a tosser and poseur.
-
• #43
Fosser?
:-)
-
• #44
Why are you lot so defensive? I thought it was a running joke that most cyclists are wankers.
-
• #45
Why are you lot so defensive? I thought it was a running joke that most cyclists are wankers.
It's not a joke, it's true.
-
• #46
With their 'serious' faces on.
It seems the only cyclists who dont piss me off in London are those riding fixed - excluding the hipsters. Just normal peeps who like cycling and dicing in and out of traffic in London.
-
• #47
I was walking, since if I want to do some proper riding I'll head out onto proper roads, where **proper speeds can be achieved. **
Fuck those cunts who ride those fucking dutch bicycle, they're always going too slow, look at this cunt for instance, trying to be all stylist while texting and wearing slipper, he's too much of a wimmin to ride a real bicycle;
mate, grow up.
-
• #48
My argument is that 90 percent of the lycra wearing fools today were fat, slow and obviously unfit. Posers, in other words.
A fascist who can't spell? Not exactly thin on the ground...
-
• #49
With their 'serious' faces on.
It seems the only cyclists who dont piss me off in London are those riding fixed - excluding the hipsters. Just normal peeps who like cycling and dicing in and out of traffic in London.
Most of them are asshats too.
-
• #50
as far as i know the following tossers have been in Richmond Park today
Fatboyralph
Dancing James
Conservative Values
Femtonatt
chebeef
Matt Ha
jimbojones
radius
bigdaddywayneIt must have been a bukake showdown with knoydart as the target
Knew it was only a matter of time.