-
• #602
stevo_com??
-
• #603
ha ha Richie you are para??
-
• #604
huh?
-
• #605
stevo_com??
HEY!!!!!!!!!! actually.......
-
• #606
So big thighs are good. Apparently there are health benefits, besides the most obvious to everyone, sexually pleasures.
*cough*
-
• #607
^
I have the same size thighs as some of the diabetics in clinic.
Mine are muscle due to cycling. theirs are due to fat content. I have yet to find the actual journal article but i bet our danish friends didn't look at thigh composition.also:
give me a good stats package and I will show compelling evidence that little finger length is more of a risk factor than waist circumference for CVD. I hate papers like that.
-
• #608
So big thighs are good. Apparently there are health benefits, besides the most obvious to everyone, sexually pleasures.
*cough*
you should go out and celebrate......
-
• #609
I'm with QUEEN on the matter of the larger lady.
-
• #610
I'm with QUEEN on the matter of the larger lady.
I'm with Warsteiner on the matter of the lager, ladies...
-
• #611
She's not that big.
-
• #612
Yum.
-
• #613
.
-
• #614
beth ditto.... noooooo, soooooo wrong
now lily cole...... nice cup of fur !
1 Attachment
-
• #615
Lily Cole!?!?!?
You're takin the piss right??! Ginger, skinny, pasty, pigeonface...
-
• #616
Lily Cole??????
no way, you my friend got the wrong thread
-
• #617
It really amazes me about cultural differences. For example, I've heard that being "Ginger" is somehow a negative attribute, and thusly worth merciless teasing at school. Yet I find most caucasian women to be rather identikit creatures, but redheads (let's get it right FFS), are like molotov cocktails to my testosterone levels. Unicorn impression....ON!
If there was a God, or maybe even if there isn't, She sure works in mysterious ways.
[Not a natural colouring, but fiery to me] -
• #618
Sure, to me (as one or two of you may realize), skinny is a pitiful condition, whereas Caribbean female shotputters, are the epitome of health.
http://zaranorthover.files.wordpress.com/2008/07/nu-shoot-smile.jpg
And for some reason, though Lily Cole has clearly been half-starved by hate-filled parents, her red hair makes up somewhat for her ribs almost being an exo-skeleton.
Me, her, and a tub of something greasy. Yes indeed. I guess I must be the weird one eh?
1 Attachment
-
• #619
slowstephen. how about you delete that picture before you get banned.
i'm not interested in arguing about if it's porn or not but it's a naked girl with her mimsy on show and that will get people into trouble at work if they look at this thread. -
• #620
And for some reason, though Lily Cole has clearly been half-starved by hate-filled parents, her red hair makes up somewhat for her ribs almost being an exo-skeleton.
You cant see any of her ribs. Your argument is invalid.
-
• #621
You cant see any of her ribs. Your argument is invalid.
It was a joke. Your insightfulness is invalid.
The clue was in the "hate-filled parents". How would I have possibly known that, unless I didn't, and it was therefore patently a jockular quip.
At ease soldier.
-
• #622
You know, I really am strongly in support of a policy on the forum in which censorship and "on topic" enforcement are both things that don't fly. That people can talk about whatever, and my task is merely tidying and not much else.
But what a waste of free and open speech, an intelligent and cool community, and just bandwidth... to have a thread like this.
Can we not try a little to put some quality into this place?
This forum is whatever we all collectively make it... and I just feel that a bit of me dies when I see that what we want it to be is apparently The Sun. Fuck that, we're better surely.
-
• #623
at GA2g: So by that logic you've been cracking the same old jokes throughout this thread hating on skinner people, and showing the 'relative' merits of being clinically overweight? To quote our friend Gerald, sorry if I missed something..
-
• #624
VB, this thread has turned into what people have wanted it to be. In fact this whole forum seems to be a conscious exercise in derailment. But who's to argue against people having fun, with or without "quality", as you put it?
In the main, I'm rather mirthless, compared to the average good person on here, and therefore I have a habit of trying to remain "on track" in most topics, especially security-related ones.
As for the "love of B.Ditto", that wasn't 100% serious. As I had said, I admired her attitude. That I find powerful women (IMO) attractive is a personality flaw of which I am guilty. But to target my well-intentioned thread as being below the quality that you wish for, is I feel regretable.
My only wish was for others to look at what might not be considered beautiful, and see someone strongly disagree with the mainstream. Was I ever going to make a convert out of anyone? I doubt it. We all know what is attractive to each of us as individuals, and there's not much that can ever change about that. It was only a push for people to see that there is at least one firmly held belief in a beauty, that is very far removed from their own.
I never took the piss. But I really do find your comment to be rather severe, even though very politely put.
-
• #625
You took it personally, my comment is to the community or segment of it who prefer to gravitate towards a gutter level of conversation and who seem inable to convey irony, sacasm, and humour through the medium of text.
It's a general face palm, rather than a reaction to a single post, or even a single thread.
Is it so wrong to want to aspire to a higher quality, a more interesting level of debate, conversation or insight?
Given I just moderated a load of race hate, some blatant sexism, and a couple of trolls. Well I wasn't doing this 6 months ago, and I can't help but feel that it will happen more the farther down a low quality path we collectively choose to walk.
Wait for it...