-
• #49103
I didn’t know that. Seems like a half decent explanation/excuse :-)
That dude on YT reviews some Rolex watches that sometimes still have stickers on, it’s unlikely the hands have been tampered with/the watch was open by him. Also, the macro is insane in that video. I am very curious though, I might look like an idiot, but I will take my loupe when going for the appointment with an AD.
I’ve seen rough edges on Rolex’s hands in Watchfinder videos but this is quite different level of negligence. -
• #49104
Don't listen to the font Nazis
-
• #49105
This is worth a read:
https://www.timezone.com/2002/09/16/the-rolex-explorer-ref-14270-part-1/
In the wake of that piece, Rolex bought out the supplier / factory and brought a lot more stuff in house. They really need to do that with the hands (if they haven’t started already with some models).
-
• #49106
Just got this back with a new dial.
2 Attachments
-
• #49107
Might have got lucky at time factor 🤞
-
• #49108
That looks great
-
• #49109
I really wanted to get a friend an Everest from time factors this time last year. Couldn't believe it went so smoothly, I had the watch by Tuesday.
-
• #49110
The Navigator?
-
• #49111
Baby dreadnought
-
• #49112
Apologies if a repost. Excellent video.
-
• #49113
Cool!
-
• #49114
Quality video, good music too. Thanks for sharing.
-
• #49115
Yes, I was just thinking how much I was enjoying the soundtrack. I have duly subbed the creator.
-
• #49116
Hmmm.
Pretty much a new watch at the end!
That'll teach em for leaving the crown out.
-
• #49117
If only my dad remembered...such a shame. Forgot the crown on his Rolex which left it royally effed.
-
• #49118
Cool video! Watched it tonight. Great soundtrack too
-
• #49119
That'll teach em for leaving the crown out.
Wasn't the crown... You didn't watch it! Neener Neener neeerer
😂
-
• #49120
Ooooof.
I did watch but clearly missed the punch line.
What was it?
-
• #49121
25mins
2 Attachments
-
• #49122
Shitola.
Rolex fail?
With a life time warranty?
-
• #49123
Rolex have a five year warranty. Before 2015 it was two years.
-
• #49124
Wow.
Dunno why I thought it was any longer...
Maybe the hype. 😎
-
• #49125
To me, what's insane, is the owner left it to rot when it happened. I mean, even back then, the watch wasn't that cheap.
"Huh... My gold rolex seems to have water in it from my swim... Fuck, ill chuck in here drawer and deal with it later." "it'll totally be serviceable when I get back to it..."
Two things - one, that looks to me like the hands have been removed and handled and refitted rather clumsily, rather than them leaving the factory like that. Not sure if elsewhere in the video he claims that it’s a fresh, new watch. (Maybe it did leave the factory like that - Rolex do have previous, eg the 1016 was infamously shoddy for a period.)
However, secondly, I agree that the hands are the weakest part of the OP. They aren’t gold (not that that matters necessarily, but a lot of people claim they are because the hour markers and coronet are) and the shaping and polishing just isn’t as sharp as the rest of the watch. Having said that, I prefer their more traditional shaping and polishing to either flat stamping or Omega’s current laser cut style.
The hands are actually one of the very few parts that Rolex still (to the best of my knowledge) do not make in-house. They use a supplier. Historically when they have made big improvements to quality it’s been when they’ve taken the work in house.
Grand Seiko totally trump them (well, and everyone else) in that area.