-
• #2927
And so it begins...
-
• #2928
ooh
-
• #2929
2-0 australia
-
• #2930
And so it ends...
-
• #2931
3-0
-
• #2932
Oh dear.
-
• #2933
Bring back Ramprakash
-
• #2934
Bring back WG Grace
-
• #2935
Bring back Boycott
-
• #2936
Hopefully Queen Liz is batting at No. 11
-
• #2937
nope, even she's had enough and fucked off home...
-
• #2938
nope, even she's had enough and fucked off on holiday ...
ftfy
-
• #2939
jonny bairstow you lucky boy!
-
• #2940
-
• #2941
Oh dear.
-
• #2942
Thank God for Bell
-
• #2943
Interesting day.
Will have to see how Aus get on when they bat. -
• #2944
Thank God for Bell
If I had a penny...
-
• #2945
watson is a dick
-
• #2946
Lolz, another comedy review.
-
• #2947
Hotspot is worse than snicko. I don't really see how Hughes was out on review. Umpire's call based on lack of a sign either way? That should be not out regardless of umpire's call really shouldn't it?
-
• #2948
this is getting interesting
-
• #2949
Snicko shows it out now, but the DRS procedure is obviously wrong. The whole umpire's call thing renders it absurd in lots of scenarios
-
• #2950
Hotspot is worse than snicko. I don't really see how Hughes was out on review. Umpire's call based on lack of a sign either way? That should be not out regardless of umpire's call really shouldn't it?
Was there definitive evidence to make it not out?
The point of DRS is to review a 'bad' umpiring decision, nothing more.
If the system shows sufficient evidence against that decision, only then can it be overturned.
cheers skydancer, and Neu where did you dig that up from!!!