Should oneonelangster be banned

ha

Careful. That sort of thing could get you banned.

or set up on a blind date.

you got the biggest cock

For this I will employ the ontological argument:

1) My giant cock is that entity than which nothing greater can be conceived.
2) It is greater to be giant than not.
3) My cock must be necessary.
4) My giant cock necessarily exists.

I think 88 is the real amount of forum members... but the most important member of all belongs to Tynan. Obviously.

For this I will employ the ontological argument:

1) My giant cock is that entity than which nothing greater can be conceived.
2) It is greater to be giant than not.
3) My cock must be necessary.
4) My giant cock necessarily exists.

I think you'll find that's a phallus-y.

I think 88 is the real amount of forum members... but the most important member of all belongs to Tynan. Obviously.

Coincidentally it is 88 inches long.

I think you'll find that's a phallus-y.

top!

I think you'll find that's a phallus-y.

[drum roll . . . . . crash !]

:)

And not only funny (punny?) but technically correct ! The ontological argument is a bare assertion fallacy.

[drum roll . . . . . crash !]

:)

And not only funny (punny?) but technically correct ! The ontological argument is a bare assertion fallacy.

come come now.

[drum roll . . . . . crash !]

:)

And not only funny (punny?) but technically correct ! The ontological argument is a bare assertion fallacy.

My work here is done.

P1 All tynans have a giant cock
P2 this tynan is a tynan
C this tynan has a giant cock

well, it is logically valid, even if not as amusing.

P1 All tynans have a giant cock
P2 this tynan is a tynan
C this tynan has a giant cock

well, it is logically valid, even if not as amusing.

P1 is a bare assertion fallacy*.

(*Although true).

come come now.

You filthy Northerner.

bare insertions aside, it is a logically valid syllogism.

come come now.

I think masterful suits you Will...

bare insertions aside, it is a logically valid syllogism.

I suppose it is internally coherent.

get a room guys...

I think masterful suits you Will...

'Sir Will' to you.

get a room gays...

Racialist.

get a groom gays

Coincidentally it is 88 inches long.

and skinny as a noodle

I suppose it is internally coherent.

That's for you to find out, surely...

and fluffy as a poodle

it's quite something

'Miracles happen everyday, change your perception of what a miracle is and you'll see them all around you'

-Jon Bon Jovi

"I'm perfect, change your perception of what perfect is, and you'll see that I am"

-Me

Not at all young sir !

If you take two people:

One claiming that the world is populated with angels and demons, saints and spirits, holy ghosts and gods, that the laws of physics can be suspended to allow miracles, magical cures, curses and spells, that - on death - they will live for all time in endless joy in paradise, while those outside the tribe will roast forever in the ovens of their all loving omnibenevolent god. That they can simply close their eyes and clasp their hands and engage freely in telepathic communion with the creator of the universe - who not only listens to their requests projected directly from their minds but also carries out intercessory tasks on their behalf - and so on.

And a second person claiming that he/she can find no reasonable evidence for any of these perverse knowledge claims.

Should we really - if we were all not steeped so deeply in this horseshit - consider the views of the second person 'controversial'.

Like I said, fucking intellectually dishonest morons.

:)

Mosques level 3 (possibly 3.5)

I always find it funny when someone picks on Scientology nutters, the basis of their religion (Xenu, DC8's , Volcanoes etc) is no more bat shit mental than pretty much every other traditional religion.