Glossy photos of girls on bikes!

Posted on
Page
of 184
  • We always watch porn. That's why I've got a lovely healthy daughter.

  • is that meat thing supposed to be about domestic violence?

    Yes - check the logo in the corner - The Coalition Against Domestic Violence.

  • Nothing happened here. No rape, no disrespect, no sexist comments about the male and female roles.

    From personal experience I can only say, that people who have hung ups about sex don't really represent nobody's view but their own. Women don't need defending - the whole idea is build on sexist foundations.

    THIS now can we get back to ornithology pls

  • I totally agree. But that is not what has happened here.
    Apart from Pistanator's choice of slang it has been very civilised

    Equating people posting flattering photos of women and saying "I think this person is pretty" with domestic violence is ridiculous, insulting and massively wrong-headed.

    ^ yes

  • THIS now can we get back to ornithology pls

    There was distateful sexist smut about tits and boobies back then.

  • I like it when men discuss their sexual dysfunction. The justifications are getting really juicy.

  • I like it when men discuss their sexual justifications. The dysfunctions are getting really juicy.

    fixed

  • I like it when men discuss their sexual dysfunction. The justifications are getting really juicy.

    What's dysfunctional about fancying the opposite sex?

  • What is functional about objectifying the opposite sex?

  • Fancy does not equal objectify. I imagine Lorraine Kelly's mind.

  • Her soft mind.

  • Nice chopper.

  • What is functional about objectifying the opposite sex?

    But is it objectifying when you say you find someone physically attractive. The whole package of beauty includes the mind and the personality.

  • What is functional about objectifying the opposite sex?

    Where is that happening?

    If there is any objectification going on its by the subjects of the photographs themselves who have all put themselves into the public eye and become actors or TV presenters.

    Now tell me what is functional about your puritanial prudish reaction to some innocent and healthy chat?

  • -

  • Now tell me what is functional about your puritanial prudish reaction to some innocent and healthy chat?

    have you gone all freudian on me? I'd better go to bed and check my dreams.

  • But is it objectifying when you say you find someone physically attractive. The whole package of beauty includes the mind and the personality.

    Not when you are slavering over a picture on the internet.

  • I give this thread 12 hours.

  • I give this thread 12 hours.

    Co-incidentally the mental age of the person who started it.

  • wait until Friday night when Rik comes online.... oh dear.....

  • I give this thread 12 hours.

    Wait until hippy merges it with the gay thread.

  • ^Rik will be on his way to Manchester for the polo champs.

  • Not when you are slavering over a picture on the internet.

    1. it says a lot about you that you can only imagine someone looking at a picture of another human being as 'slavering'

    2. You're the only person (so far) to have posted porn on this thread.

    3. Lynx has the hots for Heston Blumenthal

  • back to redheads please ...

    1. it says a lot about you that you can only imagine someone looking at a picture of another human being as 'slavering'

    2. You're the only person (so far) to have posted porn on this thread.

    3. Lynx has the hots for Heston Blumenthal

    Maplethorpe != porn

About

Glossy photos of girls on bikes!

Posted by Avatar for fasteddy @fasteddy

Actions