In the news

Posted on
Page
of 3,706
First Prev
/ 3,706
Last Next
  • http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-1335550/Merry-Christmas-Along-millions-middle-class-families-I-afford-one.html

    Brought a tear to my eye this did, 4 houses and she is whinging that she can't afford to buy the presents she'd chose... Unfuckingbelievable.

    FUCKING AAAAHHHHH "Now, I live in a two-bedroom rented flat in West London" christ thats made my fucking blood BOIL

  • Couldn't read beyond the first paragraph of it

  • Maybe she should read this. I urge everyone to read it to the end.

    http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2010/nov/27/diary-of-a-foster-parent

  • That article is utter trash. There are indeed people this superficial, selfish and vain. You miscalculated and overstretched yourself at the wrong time; deal with it. And don't save when it comes to getting others presents; save on things for yourself.

  • Couldn't read beyond the first paragraph of it

    Took me a few attempts and still not read it all...

    There was a similar piece in the Express at the weekend, frontpage story not even a bollocks editorial like that - middleclass pensioners spending their days in libraries and on public transport to avoid putting heat on. For fucks sake poor people have been doing that for years.

  • Maybe she should read this. I urge everyone to read it to the end.

    http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2010/nov/27/diary-of-a-foster-parent

    Heartbreaking yet inspiring...

  • Maybe she should read this. I urge everyone to read it to the end.

    http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2010/nov/27/diary-of-a-foster-parent

    yep. not stalking you honestly. thing that stuck with me most about that article is what happened to the kids they didn't take because they thought they would be too much (something about a kid with severe behavioural problems to which they replied "no thanks").

  • yep. not stalking you honestly. thing that stuck with me most about that article is what happened to the kids they didn't take because they thought they would be too much (something about a kid with severe behavioural problems to which they replied "no thanks").

    FFS.
    Over to you then...

  • Maybe she should read this. I urge everyone to read it to the end.

    http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2010/nov/27/diary-of-a-foster-parent

    Jees that is hard going. Equal parts harrowing and uplifting but a great read.

  • That article is utter trash. There are indeed people this superficial, selfish and vain. You miscalculated and overstretched yourself at the wrong time; deal with it. And don't save when it comes to getting others presents; save on things for yourself.

    No she has a right to her previous life style. It's the loony lefties that took it away.

  • that article reeks of pro-troll.

    and everytime you go back to read a little more, you put another ad penny in their hateful pockets

  • FFS.
    Over to you then...

    you really do think the worst of everyone don't you? do you think that by making that statement i'm implying that i think i'm better than the diarist? that i could cope with what they couldn't? mate, i got close to the brink of despair trying to deal with my slightly whingey niece for a few hours when i had a hangover on sunday. i was only pointing out that as heartbreaking and humbling as the article was, it hadn't escaped my notice that despite how selfless and caring the diarist was, there were kids that they couldn't even consider taking care of... i just wonder (and have been since i read it last week) what happens to those ones.

  • i got close to the brink of despair trying to deal with my slightly whingey niece for a few hours when i had a hangover on sunday.

    Don't get pissed the night before you have pledged child care then. Emphasis on the 'care'.

  • they probably go to a more well off family that can afford to fix smashed windows

    my old neighbours used to foster and when i met the lads at about 6 they were gone, proper fucked up, now 20 odd yrs later they are properly adjusted people, ones got a family and the others in the navy as an officer.

    it probably took about 5 or 6 yrs to bring them back to normal and i can honestly say i doubt they would of if theyd been placed with a different family

    everything has to fit for it to work, ive looked at doing it and have a few mates that do already foster but all the bullshit from the government / courts etc has put me off it (plus a baby on the way).

    a change in child protection and rights is well needed and some simple rules instead of all the crap with anything nowadays and youd see a massive rise in foster carers

  • Don't get pissed the night before you have pledged child care then. Emphasis on the 'care'.

    i had a headache. my sister, her husband and their toddler came over. i bought them and my girlfriend lunch, cake then took them to the park. and i (i thought fairly transparently) wasn't being serious i was trying to be good natured, self deprecating and make light of the fact that you had misunderstood and insinuated that i was being sanctimonious.

    i'm intrigued though, do you ever recall thinking you might have made a misjudgement or mistake? perhaps apologising for getting the wrong end of the stick? or should i expect you to just carry on attacking me till you're satisfied you've won?

    EDIT: at least i've answered my own rhetorical question. you certainly seem to think the worst of me anyway....

  • Christ on a bike. That Mail article left me snarling and spitting at the monitor.

    What an utter, utter cunt. For years she's had it really fucking good, and now her stupid investments and over spending have turned round and bitten her in her well fed fucking arse, she has the gall to tap out a quaint little article about how she only buys the occasional thing at Harrods.
    What a horrid woman.
    And she claims to be buying shit at Poundland. What bollocks. That inbred slab of mutton hasn't soiled one of her Jimmy Choo's in such a revolting place, unless she slithered thorugh the door of such a shop in the name of 'research'. It must be so vogue amongst the Sloan set to talk of their poverty at the moment, to pretend that they get buy on turkey twislers and stuff they root from the bins behind Tesco's, but in reality that posh fuck is still loaded - she doesn't mention how much her posh husband is earning, does she? So if she was on £1200, that's still not enough to buy two new houses (one in the Cotswolds) and fire up a new business. All the brass still comes from Hubby's pocket, but she has to ask him for it now, rather than having her £1200 a week to piss up against the wall as she chooses.

    What

    a

    Cunt.

    As an iside, this is an interesting spin...

    http://ohyeahmetoo.net/archives/1399

  • For years she's had it really fucking good

    People like that never really have it good. I don't mean that ironically but sincerely. They will have been actively unhappy and engaged in a frenzied storm of unhappiness to somehow make their feelings of guilt, inadequacy, and unfulfilled desire go away.

    That inbred slab of mutton has soiled one of her Jimmy Choo's in such a revolting place, unless she slithered thorugh the door of such a shop in the name of 'research'.

    I think you may have wanted 'hasn't'.

  • The 'joke' is in the report. With one word censored. It takes a lot to feel any sympathy for Katie Price but Boyle has managed it. Pathetic little man.

  • oh yeah, i told about it googled, didn't read it on account of it being the mail.

    Nah, still no sympathy not that i condone his joke, i just think her whole clan are a waste of fucking oxygen and frankly the world would be a better place if the entire gene pool was systematically and ruthlessly destroyed.

  • Post a reply
    • Bold
    • Italics
    • Link
    • Image
    • List
    • Quote
    • code
    • Preview
About

In the news

Posted by Avatar for Platini @Platini

Actions