-
• #3527
Gilgamesh, non?
-
• #3528
Hassanr, the shading is epic. Le drool
-
• #3529
The Lion and Archer are fucking ACE.
-
• #3530
thanks guys, like i said, couldn't be happier
Gilgamesh, non?
King Assurbanipal of the Neo-Assyrian empire. Although related, as the library that he founded was where the Babylonian Creation & Flood myths and the Epic of Gilgamesh were both found.
-
• #3531
thats fucking sweet, hassan. bet that killed a fair bit.
had this done on saturday. simon erl at jayne doe in hornchurch
-
• #3532
Ste says:
-
• #3533
My stomach/sides by stewart robson at frith street. Just finished on tuesday, i couldn't be happier with his work.
bloody amazing
-
• #3534
bloody amazing
+1
-
• #3535
Ste says:
that's not fair, im a well better singer
-
• #3536
hassanr, that tattoo is absolutely incredible! Fantastic work, amazing shading (plus you have the canvas, as it were, to do it justice).
-
• #3537
^ I think he's coming on to you
-
• #3538
My stomach/sides by stewart robson at frith street. Just finished on tuesday, i couldn't be happier with his work.
Looks amazing.
Ste says:
Haha! Mark loves My Chemical Romance.
-
• #3539
Nice work, Hassan.
-
• #3540
Jason Brunson -
• #3541
Awesome :D
-
• #3542
can someone tell me the joke behind that??? hitler as indian?
-
• #3543
probably just a piss take. people get swastikas and SS style tattoos just to provoke people.
that one there doesn't really tickle me though
-
• #3544
We get it Nesbit, jeez
-
• #3545
Unless you're Edward Norton in American History X, there is never a need for a swastika.
I think it's rather offensive.
-
• #3546
There's never a need, but quite often people who get swastikas do it not in order to be offensive, but to attempt to reclaim the symbol from the Nazis.
Personally, I agree with you - I don't think it's a good enough symbol to require reclamation by the tattooed, and I think any attempt to do so will be inherently muddied by its context - but it's almost never a straight up homage to racism.
-
• #3547
Unless you're Edward Norton in American History X, there is never a need for a swastika.
I think it's rather offensive.
it is offensive, that's the point. I'm not condoning it, I wouldn't want a swastika. just sayin
-
• #3548
Unless you're Edward Norton in American History X, there is never a need for a swastika.
I think it's rather offensive.
unless you're one of the many Hindu's who still use it for it originally intended meaning.
-
• #3549
that ain't a swastica though, it's the other way round.
-
• #3550
That symbol has been discussed in this thread quite a few times.
Hassan, that is LUSH! Well in mate