Cricket: England v South Africa

Posted on
Page
of 6
First Prev
/ 6
  • Deeper in the mire... why on earth didn't we put the saffers in?

    edit: FFS!!!!

  • Deeper in the mire... why on earth didn't we put the saffers in?

    edit: FFS!!!!

    we won the toss? Sounds like perfect swinging wicket

  • we won the toss? Sounds like perfect swinging wicket

    Yep, we won the toss and batted. On a green wicket. With swinging conditions. After bringing Sidebottom in for Onions.

    I despair sometimes. Geoffrey nearly had a heartattack on TMS

  • Pietersen has reached 165 runs..................................
    ......................................................................
    ......................................................................
    ......................................................................
    ......................................................................
    in 6 innings :)

  • maybe England didn't fancy batting last on that wicket? i'll be surprised if this is a high scoring match and very surprised if any team makes 350 in an innings.
    at least we have made more than 130 all out that the safs made in durban :-)

  • The Wanderers used to be a batting paradise and as far as I know it still is. 350 Is at least what you should get to win here, Australia didn't have any problems doing it the last time around either.

  • 1st innings, England are all out for 180. Let's see how The Proteas will feck it up again.
    I haven't got high hopes after what happened last week.

  • Deeper in the mire... why on earth didn't we put the saffers in?

    edit: FFS!!!!

    we did put the saffers in ...strauss kp and trott
    They contributed a lot to the SA cause

  • we did put the saffers in ...strauss kp and trott
    They contributed a lot to the SA cause

    Ha!

  • It only needs to rain for another 4 days and we are home and dry wet.

  • The Wanderers used to be a batting paradise and as far as I know it still is. 350 Is at least what you should get to win here

    It's known to be a result wicket most of the time, my family live up the road and when I spoke to my cousin last week he reckoned it would be good for the pace bowlers...

    We can talk about the decision to bat first, well who knows about that, but I don;t think anyone wants to bat last on this one. As for bringing in Sidebottom! what in blue fuck (**© **edscoble) is all that about? fine, bring him in for Pietersen, because we may as well play a bowler for all the runs he's got so far, but for Onions? the one bowler we have who can contain and bowl a good length wicket to wicket..what a cock up.

    Sidebottom was good for about one season, nowadays at best he's a poor man's Anderson. Which in itself is very poor indeed.

  • Did they think they were playing darts?

  • A great day of cricket in both Australia and South Africa.

  • "crowd trouble"?

  • "crowd trouble"?

    Thanks to shonky umpiring?

  • Post a reply
    • Bold
    • Italics
    • Link
    • Image
    • List
    • Quote
    • code
    • Preview
About

Cricket: England v South Africa

Posted by Avatar for CHUG_IT @CHUG_IT

Actions