-
• #29627
^Haha.
@dancing james, that Mather looks awesome. I want a Ti bike sooo bad. Ridden a few recently and they are, for me, the best material from which to make a road bike.
-
• #29628
He has to make at least one pointless change every week to keep the project current
Neg repped... :-)
-
• #29629
Why do you prefer sq. taper?
-
• #29630
one photo of the new bike
Robin has better ones with the bike in full finishing kit, at present have toupe on there and black saddle
What rims are those?
-
• #29631
Ceramic open pro rims
-
• #29632
Ceramic open pro rims
Damn, they're the expensive ones right, like 80 quid a pop?
-
• #29633
Why do you prefer sq. taper?
Simpler, less to go wrong, more compatibility options...
-
• #29634
Typo
should have been black pedals at present
full finish is white pedals and poss white ti swallow saddle
-
• #29635
Tart alert!
Bike looks sweet, DJ. I bet it rides even better than it looks.
-
• #29636
http://www.lfgss.com/picture.php?albumid=579&pictureid=8056
So far this bike has had a lot of cranks.
Sugino 75 (165)
Campag C-Record Pista
Dura Ace 7710
Sugino 75 (170)Saddle needs moving forward 5-10mm as I currently have it adjusted slightly further back for the risers I had on there before. This will happen tomorrow morning.
What size is the frame?
I'd heard it was big but that looks crazy big.
If i compare it to my 60cm Capo (an undeserving comparison i know, im sorry) it must be more than 65cm? -
• #29637
74.5
-
• #29638
Ha, it's an effective 66cm (sloping TT), but measures centre of BB to top of seatclamp - 68.5cm.
-
• #29639
in other words , if your not max or flickwig, youll never reach the pedals..:)
-
• #29640
Ha, it's an effective 66cm (sloping TT), but measures centre of BB to top of seatclamp - 68.5cm.
Fuck me!
So it's actually taller than it is long!
Craaaazy! -
• #29641
if you dont mind me asking to point me in the direction of said conservation tips - stopping rust etc -not had much luck myself finding complete trustworthy info.
cheers
I use Fertan, a tannic solution. You can try Corroseal. It's probably the same.
http://store.roddapaint.com/corroseal-rust-converter.htmlCheers!
-
• #29642
Fuck me!
So it's actually taller than it is long!
Craaaazy!Ahh no I meant the seat tube is effectively 66cm, due to the fact the top tube slopes down towards the front of the bike, follow me?
The top tube is 61cm.
-
• #29643
but what is the effective TT?
-
• #29644
66cm effective seat tube and 61cm toptube still means it's taller than it is long.
Like the anti-theseis of modern trick track frames.
-
• #29645
effective ST, hmmm.
-
• #29646
The seat tube would be 66cm c-t-t if the top tube was level. It's lowest point (at the headtube) is the height it would be all the way across.
Effective TT is about 59cm I think, due to the geometry of the frame. All I know is it fits me nicely.
-
• #29647
Someone talk to me about front racks. I'm thinking about getting one. Front fork is drilled for a front brake, no eyelets/bosses though. I've looked at the Cetma, Hembrow and Velo Orange offerings. Is that as good (by that I mean cheap) as it gets?
-
• #29648
@ Max, all that matters, you going to wests on thursday?
-
• #29649
@ Wools, PM edscoble probably the best idea.
-
• #29650
He has expensive tastes though. :)
Looks sweet man. Really, really nice.
Prefer square taper so traded them for some 75's with the seller (M-X).