-
• #7077
that is absolutely top notch!
(friends of yours?) -
• #7078
Just seen that on the blog, sick.
I think I've just lost another roll of exposed film. There are no words. I've never lost a single one until recently I've lost 2. -
• #7079
that is absolutely top notch!
(friends of yours?)She was from Singapore, got in touch through my tumblr and then she just happened to be backpacking through London this weekend
-
• #7080
-
• #7081
Just seen that on the blog, sick.
I think I've just lost another roll of exposed film. There are no words. I've never lost a single one until recently I've lost 2.Lost as in misplaced or lost as in screwed up? If the latter you devving yourself?
-
• #7082
Dropped, misplaced, abandoned etc.
-
• #7083
Bummer. Hope you find it soon.
-
• #7084
just remembered that someone mentioned Water Light Time a while back, I got some books to freecycle, potentially of interest:
Heaven & Earth: Unseen by the naked eye (mostly microscope and telescope photos) - A5ish paperback - VGC
Isabel Toledo: Fashion from the Inside Out, Valerie Steele & Patricia Mears - bigger than A4 hardback - rear of dustjacket curling at the bottom edge
Water Light Time, David Doubilet - bigger than A4 paperback - VGCLondon-based, no post. can deliver to Souths, SEs, central, LMNH etc
-
• #7085
I think it was mentioned on here a while ago that xp2 at least, and probably other films can benefit for a little over exposure, which results in a reduction in contrast.
I've been looking into up/down rating my film and I just wanted to make sure I fully understand the process.
I was hoping someone might be able to answer a couple of questions I have, I've been doing a little research but have not ended up more confused.
Firstly is it correct that if I'm exposing something that is ISO 400 as if it was 200 will be downrating the film, and so this will need to be pulled in the lab and if I under expose it will need to be pushed in the lab.
OR
Do I up/down rate the film as I choose while shooting and develop as normal? My only concern there being that I am then scanning at home rather than doing a traditional print and so do not have the same flexibility
-
• #7086
Arguably both are correct.
If I understand it correctly, your first proposal would apply to any film where you are not using the 'correct' (i.e. manufacturer's) rating.
Your 'develop as normal' approach should largely work with XP2 (and other chromogenic?) film where variations in exposure give useable images but with some variation in apparent grain size.
When it first came out, XP was a bit like photographic marmite with lovers and haters espousing all manner of claimed advantages or problems - many of these ideas can still be found even when they are complete twaddle. Read more ( http://www.flickr.com/groups/64599571@N00/discuss/ for example ) then test your thinking by noting what works for you and what doesn't.
-
• #7087
The weather wasn't conducive to cycling today so Itook some photos inside the flat instead,
Untitled by mechanical_vandal, on Flickr
Untitled by mechanical_vandal, on Flickr -
• #7088
Finally got round to dev first roll of Portra 800 I shot.
Pretty content with how it scans in terms of grain & colour, given it's high iso C41 film.(this is unedited bar some minor adjustements in scan)
-
• #7089
-
• #7090
Wicked shot.
-
• #7091
Flipping fantastic, those steps
-
• #7092
Haha, wow..
-
• #7093
Two from the Getty Center, Los Angeles, last year. Just had lots of film developed and scanned at 'digitalab': disappointed the low-res scans are 72dpi.
-
• #7094
cracking shots though! Colours are fantastic
-
• #7095
They're Velvia 100. The scans came through a little drab so I pushed the vibrance and saturation a tad in Lightroom and the colour just popped out.
-
• #7096
cracking shots though! Colours are fantastic
+1
-
• #7097
awesome shots snoops
-
• #7098
Nice weather for shooting most of this weekend!
Had fun overexposing a roll of XP2, I really like it when it's overcast!
-
• #7099
Lovely shots, I especially like the 3rd and 2nd last ones!
-
• #7100
Thank you very kindly. Although I'm not 100% sure about XP2 anymore. I was a really big fan of it, but having tried portra I'd rather stick with it for now, as it does look rather nice if you desaturate it in post
I already wanted to go to places like that, those shots make me want to more!!
My latest attempt at pictures...