-
• #2102
It has.
Just force refresh, clear cache, and if it's still ugly stop using Comic Sans as the default font in your browser.It's still farkin ugly.
What was the old forum font?
-
• #2103
Would you post more often if it was more attractive?
My goodness me.Would you like me to post more often?
I've been too busy of late to give this place the
attentionmerging it deserves but this refresh is hurting my eyes.BikeRadar >>>>>>>>>>
-
• #2104
hippy uses Colossus Fat Extra Bold 24hr.
That's my deodorant.
-
• #2105
Do you use deodorant for your most intimate part?
-
• #2106
My left ear is au naturale.
-
• #2107
Seriously though.. this place is fucking hideous. You've forced me to login to bikeradar for the first time in about 4 years. Don't make me start talking about commuter racing and scalps.
-
• #2108
No, thats way I'm gonna let you win.
-
• #2109
I've got a transparent comment box bit on Chrome beta linux too
-
• #2110
Seriously though.. this place is fucking hideous. You've forced me to sit on to bikeradar for the first time in about 4 years.
Poor Bike Radar.
-
• #2111
...this refresh is hurting my eyes.
The type could use tracking out a little bit.
I think it's called Letter Spacing in CSS? -
• #2112
The search tool doesn't work when on the 'live updates' page. It's fine on homepage and subscribed threads. Not tried it on any other pages.
Also the font in the reply box has grown huge compared to the thread font size.
Win 7 / Firefox
-
• #2113
Seriously though.. this place is fucking hideous. You've forced me to login to bikeradar for the first time in about 4 years. Don't make me start talking about commuter racing and scalps.
Aside from the logo and navigation, the place is pretty much as it was. The only difference is font size, and the default font is now dictated by your browser.
What browser + OS are you using? And do you have a screenshot of the hideousness?
-
• #2114
Oh, and I know 2 days is too small a sample to trust, but thus far:
- Page speed increased over the whole site
- Increased time spent on site
- Increased engagement (number of posts made and number of user registrations)
- Increased traffic from Google (it detects we're faster)
- Increased mobile device usage (more overall, not a drop in desktop usage)
- Increased page views
And more importantly for me, and I'm really hoping these are sustained:
- Increase in click throughs and conversions on the affiliate links
Not a single metric has declined in the past two days, and the bottom line affiliate scheme earnings for Monday and Tuesday were double the figure from last week
All the dumb numbers say that change is a wild success. Though I won't know this for sure until this performance has been sustained for at least 2 weeks.
- Page speed increased over the whole site
-
• #2115
- Increased time spent on site
Yea I've been playing with font size (AAAA) reading everything 4 times deciding the best font. Then when I played around with the browser font (Symbol was fun), then I broke my forum view and too to ages to discover what I'd done. So lots more time here.
But really it IS much more accessible - Increased time spent on site
-
• #2116
All the increased traffic is me writing about how my brain now hurts looking at the post list.
-
• #2117
You should see mine... I've discovered Linotype fonts and am using a different one each day.
Today: Optima nova
http://www.linotype.com/54211/OptimanovaProRegular-product.html
-
• #2118
But seriously... this looks really bad for you? Or just jarring because other sites have such small text so this feels enormous?
-
• #2119
Okay so the thread titles are huge, but the (1, 2, 3..) pages count is small. This makes it hard to ID familiar threads.
Also, the post content is large but the admin text (edit, quick reply, quote, etc) is tiny. The page counts are tiny too.
That's with the whole thing sized down a bit to make it bareable. FF
-
• #2120
So you're using Firefox on Windows and... you have your zoom settings to what?
A screenshot would be easier you know.
-
• #2121
Too much bold going on.
So I'm thinking of removing a lot of the bold... and instead of emphasising links with bold, I'll de-emphasise the secondary navigation.
But then... there's a problem: On the thread lists I've been indicating new items by bolding them, and old items by leaving them unbolded. If I remove bold then you can't tell what's new.
So aside from proposing to remove bold items, I propose to use background colours to indicate what you're read on the thread listings.
Close to white = unread
Close to grey = readI'll knock up an example and see what you think.
-
• #2122
Here's the example attached.
Subtle changes here:
1) Remove vertical colour bands
2) Introduced white background for unread rows
3) Introduced light gray background for read rows
4) Reduced the size of the post count value
5) Reduced the size of the thread view value
6) Removed all underlines from linksWhat do you all think?
Should I do it?
1 Attachment
-
• #2123
Think the read\unread distinction is now quite hard to distinguish...
-
• #2124
Actually... got the old (current) and the new (image attached above) side by side... and seriously, I can't think of a reason to keep the bolded titles and vertical banding, nor the selective link underlines.
If no-one has serious objections before 1pm, I'll do it.
-
• #2125
Noticed that if I'm on "Today's posts" and click on the new font re-size AAAA's, it punts me to the search page.
Still does this.
When I load the comment pane at the left of a post, the element which contains "comment: user name" is transparent in FF-Nightly on W7 and Android browser on my Touchpad.