-
• #9452
cannondale's limited edition onbike. bleugh.
I saw a white one today - FUGLY!!! Oh so FUGLY! -
• #9453
Are these the wrong way round?
-
• #9454
What are 'these'?
-
• #9455
these are shit looking bike parts (even makes the thomson look bad).
-
• #9456
forks?
-
• #9457
forks don't look the wrong way around to me..
-
• #9458
Thompson stem however is upside down
-
• #9459
Clearly a 650 rear too...
-
• #9460
-
• #9461
Clearly a 650 rear too...
Do you think the front is a Shamal or a Vento?
-
• #9462
Are these the wrong way round?
nope.
-
• #9463
Do you think the front is a Shamal or a Vento?
It's a Spin, because the ones that weren't spin, only said Trispoke™.
UTFS FTW OMFG . lol. -
• #9464
Do you think the front is a Shamal or a Vento?
Definitely Araya...
-
• #9465
Booyakasha!
These made me sick a bit
-
• #9466
-
• #9467
I'll take your words for it that that Somec frame is amongst the best and most exclusive on the planet but when I see track ends fitted like that and the excess overlapping metal not filed down flush with the seat stays and chainstays the job looks unfinished to me
-
• #9468
must be a joke, road frame with chain out of view so we cant see that it doesn't fit and the choice/value of components and lock are just crying out spoof
-
• #9469
I doubt that is an intentional joke. expensive parts looking all mismatched and silly. A terrible lock badly used - it screams Japan.
-
• #9472
But it's *Gorgeous Baby Blue*™, that has to add at least £100 to the value
probably barspinz too
-
• #9473
look at that gear ration. Spin to win.
-
• #9474
30/12 gives about 66", perfectly reasonable gear.
colour coded regal copies
eugh