-
• #6952
steering with your nads FTW
Looks like a practical town bike to me. I thought it had a 'pedal-backwards-slowey-downy-thing'*
(*currenty learning bike terminology from Balki)
Footbrakes? possibley, not sure what they look like to be honest so couldn't say. For a town bike I'd have been tempted to fit a front brake, and would have designed it around something other than the lights to make it a bit less gimicky.
It's probably not as bad as I made out, and its never going to win many friends on here is it :)
Pig ugly though :)
-
• #6953
It'll be a coaster brake, stop pissing your pants.
-
• #6954
Is there a rifle hidden in the top tube Jackal stylez?
Haha! or perhaps baguette carrying capability for trips to the patisserie?
-
• #6955
Footbrakes? possibley, not sure what they look like to be honest so couldn't say. For a town bike I'd have been tempted to fit a front brake, and would have designed it around something other than the lights to make it a bit less gimicky.
It's probably not as bad as I made out, and its never going to win many friends on here is it :)
Pig ugly though :)
Anything with lots of built in components, that cant be upgraded or changed is never going to go down well on a bike forum ;)
Should have a front brake really. But I get the impression its meant to be cable free.
-
• #6956
Polo mallet compartment?
-
• #6957
You might want to patent that
-
• #6958
-
• #6959
-
• #6960
Fork rake looks fine, even if it took a funny route to get there
1 Attachment
-
• #6961
surely they are bent and flipped regular forks?
-
• #6962
yes they are
-
• #6963
Fork rake looks fine, even if it took a funny route to get there
My eyes say the rake would be the same if the fork was reversed. But your line says otherwise.
headache inducing optical illusion, or Hetchins style damping system?
-
• #6966
http://static.londonfgss.com/attachments/19172d1261147292-img_0707.jpg
I am so sorry,but in my opinion this has to stay in the antiporn....
sorry again to the owner!! -
• #6967
surely they are bent and flipped regular forks?
yes they are
defo, the dropouts are backwards
-
• #6968
http://static.londonfgss.com/attachments/19172d1261147292-img_0707.jpg
I am so sorry,but in my opinion this has to stay in the antiporn....
sorry again to the owner!!It ticks all the boxes, but remember, the sum can be greater than the thing of it's bits, or something.
-
• #6969
-
• #6970
harsh
-
• #6971
I normaly think Pauls cranks look a bit shit but those look really good on that.
The wheels and bars look shit.
Oh and I like the brake.
-
• #6972
i think the crank suits it too
-
• #6973
i like the bike, nothing wrong with it at all. not what i'd chose but it's not my bike.
-
• #6974
http://static.londonfgss.com/attachments/19172d1261147292-img_0707.jpg
I am so sorry,but in my opinion this has to stay in the antiporn....
sorry again to the owner!!playintodacrowd
-
• #6975
This is certainly a repost - maybe even a recent one. However, this monstrousity is actually for sale in Selfridges, which means that people might actually buy it (didn't catch the price, not cheap I imagine).
Those are the lights in the scaffold tube that someone has mounted in place of the top tube btw. And its a brakeless...
They've been sold in the Netherlands for a while. They are quite cheap over there. It's an alu frame (I'm pretty sure) so a lot less like a scafold tube than a Charge Plug. And is it really brakeless, or just running a coaster brake?
Unless its brakeless, in which case its fawked up.