Bike Anti-Porn - When Things Go Wrong

Posted on
Page
of 1,958
First Prev
/ 1,958
Last Next
  • Are the bars on the Crosscheck a pair of On One Fleegles? I've been wanting to try out a pair of them on my ss mtb but I'm afraid it will make the bike feel more like a town bike.. Anyone got experience with them?

  • Are the bars on the Crosscheck a pair of On One Fleegles? I've been wanting to try out a pair of them on my ss mtb but I'm afraid it will make the bike feel more like a town bike.. Anyone got experience with them?

    Yeah. I have Fleagle Pros, initially uncut, now cut to about 50cm(ish?)

    If your going from risers to Fleegles on a mtb they'll be slightly lower and with more sweep. They're 0 rise because they're meant for 29ers with hight front ends.

    The sweep is really comfortable and good when your out of the saddle and pedalling. But I don't tend to do that on my mtb because I've got gears and I'll get better traction (and go quicker) If I do it seated. You'll probably like them for SS. The pay-off is the bars are not so good descending rocky steep stuff and when you've got your weight over the back and your covering a brake.

    I took them off the mtb and tried them on my tarck bike for a laugh... and they're amazing. For me they work best set lower and on a shorter stem than I would with risers. A bit like racy, narrow 'tasche bars. Massive fun. Not as good a bullhorns in the hills, or for squeezing through gaps, but a brilliant compromise.

  • They're going on my new build*

    *and I fully expect to get shit for this.

  • Hmm thanks. To get the bike running I installed a straight flat bar because that's what I had, but for XC riding I want them to be a bit higher. So I will need either a riser bar or a higher stem if I decide to go with the Fleegle. I like the look of the Fleegle but a tall stem would probably ruin it.. A pair of risers bay be the most sensible solution.

  • ^^ holy shit, that's bad

  • Don't know if this is a repost or what

    I'm feeling both of these! CMYK looks good :-)

    [/semitroll]

  • Olli Erkkila bikes are not anti-porn, he is far too knowing for that.

  • why???? bristol..

  • Tight, lose the spok and id own it.

  • why???? bristol..

    Because he can't be bothered to ride in an uncomfortable manner?

    perfectly normal TBH if you want to ride upright for a bits.

  • Tight, lose the spok and id own it.

    And lose the front wheel, chainring and pedals, probably the cranks too.

  • And the saddle/post, fuck it, its a shit build.

  • And the tyres are too big. So much so that the radius of the tyre is too flat for the seatpost cutout.

  • what? You're posting bikes in the opposite threads.

  • The fucking shame.

  • shame? That's a beauty.

  • Don't know if this is a repost or what

    no way double spokes are always porn

    .......right?

  • is that a fairing for your arse? ^^^

  • is that a fairing for your arse? ^^^

    Selle Italia Appoggio Lombare

    That bat bike is pretty cool btw.

  • The fucking shame.

    srsly whats with all the fucking? you've posted about 5 bikes recently and they've all been fucking something or other... necessary?

  • Some fucking people

  • fucks sake

  • Post a reply
    • Bold
    • Italics
    • Link
    • Image
    • List
    • Quote
    • code
    • Preview
About

Bike Anti-Porn - When Things Go Wrong

Posted by Avatar for flickwg @flickwg

Actions