Bike Anti-Porn - When Things Go Wrong

Because it has no foot retention and a single brake.

foot retention isn't that big a deal if you have a front brake IMHO.

you talking bollocks once more Ed

foot retention isn't that big a deal if you have a front brake IMHO.

+1
i totally agree. you're probably the only other person i've ever heard say that.
when i first started riding fixed in the city, for like 3 months i couldn't get the hang of clips since i was used to SPD's, and so i took em off and it was fine. now i've got retention on everything, be it clip or clipless, but i genuinely believe people freak out about this too much.
more like foot pretention.

more like foot pretention.

Missed that earlier.
Nice.

http://fixedgeargallery.com/

repost?

av3s

are you going to be asking questions in every single thread??

Any question answered thread >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4114/4769042307_5dcaed94c3_b.jpg

Bars ruin it. Zero rake fork WTF?!

Altogether utterly replusive. Well done!

NB. What the hell is that headtube angle all about?

Probably to allow for a zero rake fork?

I might be wrong, seems like a weird idea.

Probably to allow for a zero rake fork?

I might be wrong, seems like a weird idea.

No, I suspect you are right there - saves weight I guess. Horrid and highly unusual thou!

More likely they changed the fork to fit a larger wheel.

na, the rear chainstays look at the right angle

Weird.

http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4114/4769042307_5dcaed94c3_b.jpg

Must be gash to ride!

Maybe it was just built buy an idiot.

looks like a front wheel is already smaller that rear?.. how much smaller should it be?
in any case, fits the thread pretty well

sorry

i really like the f&f

confused

negative/backward rake forks would make it really erm... 'special'

$2500 on ebay

Flea Host.

Nothing wrong with that which Max couldn't fix

1 Attachment