-
• #36277
That comma works for me...
awaits grammar police
Just spotted half the forum in the Brockwell Park/Herne Hill area... What a day...
-
• #36278
I think someone DAS'd me earlier, but I ignored them because I was on gears.
#feelingsuperior -
• #36279
Just spotted half the forum in the Brockwell Park/Herne Hill area... What a day...
Just done an hour of pootling in those very environs. The closest I got to bikey spotting/being spotted was trackstanding in front of a Condor van at some traffic lights.
Hrumph :( -
• #36280
that random comma really threw off how I read that sentence.
It's not random. Read it in Peter O'Toole's voice and you will see.
-
• #36281
Jack Bruce. At his home in Colchester. Lovely afternoon.
-
• #36282
It's not random. Read it in Peter O'Toole's voice and you will see.
OK, so I slurred a bit, dropped a bon-mot or two and astounded all with my repartee, only to find the comma was still in the wrong, place darling.
-
• #36283
comma is in the right place, you're doing it wrong.
(it makes perfect sense to me)
-
• #36284
I beg, to differ
-
• #36285
OK, so I slurred a bit, dropped a bon-mot or two and astounded all with my repartee, only to find the comma was still in the wrong, place darling.
It's a right place as you can easily split the sentence in that place. Try it at home - replace *those *and who with a noun "hipster". In my language, which operates on latin grammar, it makes perfect sense.
-
• #36286
Gotcha. Anyway, I've spotted nobody.
-
• #36287
You're new here, aren't you?
Hipsters don't post on here regularly - apart from hipster, hipster dress like hipsters ironically.like this?
-
• #36288
I never read the original post, was just being contrary. I feel I may have picked the wrong side.
-
• #36289
like this?
Not enough profanities.
-
• #36290
Spotted: TheorySwine getting served grammatically by a Polish emigre... Ouchers... :S
-
• #36291
You're new here, aren't you?
Hipsters don't post on here regularly - apart from those, who dress like hipsters ironically.that random comma really threw off how I read that sentence.
That comma works for me...
awaits grammar police
Just spotted half the forum in the Brockwell Park/Herne Hill area... What a day...
It's not random. Read it in Peter O'Toole's voice and you will see.
OK, so I slurred a bit, dropped a bon-mot or two and astounded all with my repartee, only to find the comma was still in the wrong, place darling.
comma is in the right place, you're doing it wrong.
(it makes perfect sense to me)
I beg, to differ
It's a right place as you can easily split the sentence in that place. Try it at home - replace *those *and who with a noun "hipster". In my language, which operates on latin grammar, it makes perfect sense.
Gotcha. Anyway, I've spotted nobody.
I never read the original post, was just being contrary. I feel I may have picked the wrong side.
Spotted: TheorySwine getting served grammatically by a Polish emigre... Ouchers... :S
I love these opportunities for a decent multi-quote. :)
TheorySwine is right, of course. It isn't possible to separate that relative clause by a comma given his evidently intended meaning (it makes no sense if you do). With a comma, it is a non-restrictive relative clause, without it, it is restrictive.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/English_relative_clauses#Restrictive_or_non-restrictive
There is a difference in meaning if you set a comma: 'those, who' tells us something about specific people (which EEI clearly doesn't intend). He means only those (potentially unknown ones) who conform only to the description that he gives.
In other languages, this difference can be marked in other ways, but in English it's quite subtle, albeit still an important distinction.
-
• #36292
exactly what I said before, just more wordy.
-
• #36293
^that's how you use a comma
-
• #36294
alternatively a semi colon would work
-
• #36295
^that's how you use a comma.
That's how you use a full stop.
-
• #36296
^that's how you use a comma
I have a reputation to defend, you know.
-
• #36297
alternatively a semi colon would work
Where? Not in EEI's first sentence it wouldn't.
-
• #36298
^^^no your a cunt
-
• #36299
that's how you use a full stop.
☞☞☞☞☞☞☞☞☞☞☞☞☞☞☞☞☞☞☞☞☞☞☞☞
-
• #36300
^^^ Hehe.
that random comma really threw off how I read that sentence.