-
• #1952
Some more details (possibly) from the USADA report, although asserting:
The UCI’s reaction to the report, he suggests, “is likely to be dismay that doping should have been so integral to U.S. Postal’s modus operandi and wonder that it remained undiscovered for so long.
Seems to miss the point entirely
-
• #1953
New Livestrong Holiday range is out! I'm going to get one of everything.
http://hypebeast.com/2012/10/nike-livestrong-2012-holiday-collection/
-
• #1954
^ yeah me to, that new livestrong stuff looks really dope
-
• #1955
When did Lance Armstrong's Austin coffee shop, 'Juan Pelota', open?!
("Juan" sounds similar to "one" and "Pelota" is Spanish for "ball.")Strange sense of humour.
-
• #1956
He has a twitter alter ego account called that - @juanpelota.
-
• #1957
Old story re-told
http://www.sfgate.com/sports/article/Blood-tests-indicate-doping-expert-says-3927234.php#ixzz28hx7K5uVbut a nice bit of Fabiani bullshit:
The rules are clear to everyone but USADA: You either pass a drug test, or you fail it, there is no in between
which could just as easily have been restated by any normal person as:
The rules are clear to everyone but Armstrong: You either dope, or you don't, there is no in between.
For the millionth time Lance, Fabiani and all the fanboys:
Getting away with doping is not the same thing as not dopingFabiani's comment is archetypal of the Team Armstrong tactic of answering a different question to the one posed. The dodgy blood values make a strong case for a non-analytical positive, so team Armstrong keeps banging on about all the analytical tests he managed to cheat.
-
• #1958
Armstrong has passed every test ever given to him...
This isn't quite true either, is it?
Surely, you either pass all your tests or you don't....
-
• #1959
Let us not forget that he failed a test for cortisone at the 1999 Tour but the UCI and ASO allowed him to use a back dated Therapeutic Usage Exemption (TUE) from his team doctor.
-
• #1960
http://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/cycling/2012/10/09/lance-armstrong-doping-case/1622699/
Clearly Armstrong has a lawyer in Tim Herman who doesn't understand either the "cab rank" principle of legal representation or the consequences of a nolo contendere plea. Either that or, like Armstrong himself and his favourite gobshite Mark Fabiani, Herman is just a disingenuous little prick who is only in this case for the money he can milk from credulous subscribers to the Livestrong Foundation.
-
• #1961
USADA case must be fucking amazing if this is the "not contesting" response.
Lance's other lawyers have also taken lots of cash from US tobacco companies but it seems almost churlish to chastise a triathlete.
-
• #1962
Wait, tobacco is bad for you?
-
• #1963
Patton Boggs says no.
Also says cancer bad mm'kay?
-
• #1964
David Walsh says the USADA report with "1000's of pages" will arrive @ UCI today.
A 200 page summary possibly released to public today.
-
• #1965
FFS I need some new glasses, keep seeing tweets and posts about Lance Armstrong with references to Tim Henman, and wondering what that poncey fucker has to do with it all.
-
• #1966
David Walsh says the USADA report with "1000's of pages" will arrive @ UCI today.
A 200 page summary possibly released to public today.
Report runs to 3000 pages
-
• #1967
FFS I need some new glasses, keep seeing tweets and posts about Lance Armstrong with references to Tim Henman, and wondering what that poncey fucker has to do with it all.
this, hahaha. I need a bigger screen or longer arms too
-
• #1968
Maybe Lance is justifying PED use by saying 'I just didn't want to be another Henman' and Henman is tweeting back saying 'I know, I didn't either but my mum said drugs are bad for you'...
-
• #1969
Report runs to 3000 pages
Executive summary by tomorrow please... -
• #1970
Here's Travis Tygart's statement published 5 minutes ago ;)
Statement From USADA CEO Travis T. Tygart Regarding The U.S. Postal Service Pro Cycling Team Doping Conspiracy
October 10, 2012
Today, we are sending the ‘Reasoned Decision’ in the Lance Armstrong case and supporting information to the Union Cycliste International (UCI), the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA), and the World Triathlon Corporation (WTC). The evidence shows beyond any doubt that the US Postal Service Pro Cycling Team ran the most sophisticated, professionalized and successful doping program that sport has ever seen.
The evidence of the US Postal Service Pro Cycling Team-run scheme is overwhelming and is in excess of 1000 pages, and includes sworn testimony from 26 people, including 15 riders with knowledge of the US Postal Service Team (USPS Team) and its participants’ doping activities. The evidence also includes direct documentary evidence including financial payments, emails, scientific data and laboratory test results that further prove the use, possession and distribution of performance enhancing drugs by Lance Armstrong and confirm the disappointing truth about the deceptive activities of the USPS Team, a team that received tens of millions of American taxpayer dollars in funding.
Together these different categories of eyewitness, documentary, first-hand, scientific, direct and circumstantial evidence reveal conclusive and undeniable proof that brings to the light of day for the first time this systemic, sustained and highly professionalized team-run doping conspiracy. All of the material will be made available later this afternoon on the USADA website at www.usada.org.
The USPS Team doping conspiracy was professionally designed to groom and pressure athletes to use dangerous drugs, to evade detection, to ensure its secrecy and ultimately gain an unfair competitive advantage through superior doping practices. A program organized by individuals who thought they were above the rules and who still play a major and active role in sport today.
The evidence demonstrates that the ‘Code of Silence’ of performance enhancing drug use in the sport of cycling has been shattered, but there is more to do. From day one, we always hoped this investigation would bring to a close this troubling chapter in cycling’s history and we hope the sport will use this tragedy to prevent it from ever happening again.
Of course, no one wants to be chained to the past forever, and I would call on the UCI to act on its own recent suggestion for a meaningful Truth and Reconciliation program. While we appreciate the arguments that weigh in favor of and against such a program, we believe that allowing individuals like the riders mentioned today to come forward and acknowledge the truth about their past doping may be the only way to truly dismantle the remaining system that allowed this “EPO and Blood Doping Era” to flourish. Hopefully, the sport can unshackle itself from the past, and once and for all continue to move forward to a better future.
Our mission is to protect clean athletes by preserving the integrity of competition not only for today’s athletes but also the athletes of tomorrow. We have heard from many athletes who have faced an unfair dilemma — dope, or don’t compete at the highest levels of the sport. Many of them abandoned their dreams and left sport because they refused to endanger their health and participate in doping. That is a tragic choice no athlete should have to make.
It took tremendous courage for the riders on the USPS Team and others to come forward and speak truthfully. It is not easy to admit your mistakes and accept your punishment. But that is what these riders have done for the good of the sport, and for the young riders who hope to one day reach their dreams without using dangerous drugs or methods.
These eleven (11) teammates of Lance Armstrong, in alphabetical order, are Frankie Andreu, Michael Barry, Tom Danielson, Tyler Hamilton, George Hincapie, Floyd Landis, Levi Leipheimer, Stephen Swart, Christian Vande Velde, Jonathan Vaughters and David Zabriskie.
The riders who participated in the USPS Team doping conspiracy and truthfully assisted have been courageous in making the choice to stop perpetuating the sporting fraud, and they have suffered greatly. In addition to the public revelations, the active riders have been suspended and disqualified appropriately in line with the rules. In some part, it would have been easier for them if it all would just go away; however, they love the sport, and they want to help young athletes have hope that they are not put in the position they were -- to face the reality that in order to climb to the heights of their sport they had to sink to the depths of dangerous cheating.
I have personally talked with and heard these athletes’ stories and firmly believe that, collectively, these athletes, if forgiven and embraced, have a chance to leave a legacy far greater for the good of the sport than anything they ever did on a bike.
Lance Armstrong was given the same opportunity to come forward and be part of the solution. He rejected it.
Instead he exercised his legal right not to contest the evidence and knowingly accepted the imposition of a ban from recognized competition for life and disqualification of his competitive results from 1998 forward. The entire factual and legal basis on the outcome in his case and the other six active riders’ cases will be provided in the materials made available online later today. Two other members of the USPS Team, Dr. Michele Ferrari and Dr. Garcia del Moral, also received lifetime bans for perpetrating this doping conspiracy.
Three other members of the USPS Team have chosen to contest the charges and take their cases to arbitration: Johan Bruyneel, the team director; Dr. Pedro Celaya, a team doctor; and Jose “Pepe” Marti, the team trainer. These three individuals will receive a full hearing before independent judges, where they will have the opportunity to present and confront the evidence, cross-examine witnesses and testify under oath in a public proceeding.
From day one in this case, as in every potential case, the USADA Board of Directors and professional staff did the job we are mandated to do for clean athletes and the integrity of sport. We focused solely on finding the truth without being influenced by celebrity or non-celebrity, threats, personal attacks or political pressure because that is what clean athletes deserve and demand.”
-
• #1971
You could knock me over with a feather.
-
• #1973
Shit the bed.
-
• #1974
Ooooh fuck. Here we go again.
Another one that bites the dust.
His website is on meltdown.
Useful link list:
http://www.cyclingnews.com/features/index-of-lance-armstrong-doping-allegations-over-the-years