-
• #59977
The Essex garden doesn't help.
-
• #59979
I personally like that frame (and lots of other IF frames) a lot. The carbon/Ti tubes look rad, nice colour decals and the little crown lug bits where the tubes meet look good. When you see them built they usually follow the same formula though, i.e put the most expensive stuff you can find on it, which definitely isn't the recipe for bike porn.
Looks a bit better like this?
I can see why some people wouldn't like them I guess..
ftfy
-
• #59980
-
• #59981
Looks a bit better like this?
Not really, the gold anodized long cage mod to the Di2 mech, paired with the dinner plate cassette and compact crankset, is the main problem. The "matching" bottle cage and Chris King is not helping either.
-
• #59982
As Sanddancer said in fewer words.
-
• #59983
Me gusta Jambon's Pinarello big time!
-
• #59984
-
• #59985
^ QR skewers on the wrong side
-
• #59986
^I like that,it certainly looks light.Just out of curiousity what would that weigh approx, and can the Lightweight logos be removed?
-
• #59987
Saw this and thought of Sumo, non drive-side i know but it's awesome.
Who needs kids anyway?
-
• #59988
Saw this in msac, in Melbourne. Loads of really nice bikes around this part of the world, but this Kennedy track frame caught my eye. Immaculately welded Ti, aero profile seat-tube with cut-away for clearance, really nice, solid looking track-ends. I'd be really interested to see how it rides on the track.
Melbourne...Kennedy...can only mean one thing.
-
• #59989
I personally like that frame (and lots of other IF frames) a lot. The carbon/Ti tubes look rad, nice colour decals and the little crown lug bits where the tubes meet look good. When you see them built they usually follow the same formula though, i.e put the most expensive stuff you can find on it, which definitely isn't the recipe for bike porn.
Looks a bit better like this?
http://www.ledr.com/colours/black.jpg
I can see why some people wouldn't like them I guess..
Fixed again.
-
• #59990
That burn doesn't burn so good when you don't embed the image properly but thanks for trying.
-
• #59991
^I like that,it certainly looks light.Just out of curiousity what would that weigh approx, and can the Lightweight logos be removed?
5.8kg. I don't think the Lightweight logos are stickers so removal wouldn't be straight forward, though I might be wrong I've never seen a set in the wild.
-
• #59992
Won't they just look like Oriental Express rims if you take the crappy letters off?
-
• #59993
Exactly, they'd look better.
-
• #59994
For what it's worth, if it wasn't for the curved seat stays (hate, hate, hate them on any frame - curving in any direction) I'd absolutely love one of those IF frames.
-
• #59995
Who needs kids anyway?
Actually, Roberto Chiappa has two kids, Devlyn and Moorea.
Wiki or other sources do not mention possible other kids outside his marriage. -
• #59996
-
• #59997
what? rim brakes in the back and cable disc in the front? did they run out of money?
-
• #59998
well, those forks dont come cheap. EBB?
-
• #59999
I prefer my mate's one frankly;
-
• #60000
[QUOTE=toby.d;2694012]I personally like that frame (and lots of other IF frames) a lot. The carbon/Ti tubes look rad, nice colour decals and the little crown lug bits where the tubes meet look good. When you see them built they usually follow the same formula though, i.e put the most expensive stuff you can find on it, which definitely isn't the recipe for bike porn.
Looks a bit better like this?
I can see why some people wouldn't like them I guess..
ftfy[/QUOTE]
ftfy&fy
1 Attachment
I personally like that frame (and lots of other IF frames) a lot. The carbon/Ti tubes look rad, nice colour decals and the little crown lug bits where the tubes meet look good. When you see them built they usually follow the same formula though, i.e put the most expensive stuff you can find on it, which definitely isn't the recipe for bike porn.
Looks a bit better like this?
I can see why some people wouldn't like them I guess..