Bike porn

Posted on
Page
of 4,156
First Prev
/ 4,156
Last Next
  • The anti-compact geometry.

  • cycle around them?

    Or jump 'em.

  • if that cinelli is aluminum, pot holes must be horrendous?

    aluminum being stiff doesn't make it uncomfortable, it depend on how the framebuilder build/design it rather.

    (as nail said, just cycle around them, even if you have an MTB).

  • In this case with form over function?

    #notabikedesigner

  • Near perfect. Shall I close the thread?

  • yes please do

  • The anti-compact geometry.

    I don't think anti-compact is necessarily stiffer than compact, otherwise I'm sure a lot of manufacturers would offer anti-compact frames, which is quite the opposite of the current trend.

  • Compact offers a stiffer frameset but then you have seatpost flex which gives some comfort.

  • Yep, as oz says.

  • So in this case it's the other way around, you reduce seatpost flex at the cost of frame stiffness. So it all kind of equals out except the anti-compact geo of the Mash uses a lot more material which adds unnecessary weight which means Mash is still fail but pot holes aren't more of a hazard.

  • Potholes are more a hazard to your rims and innertubes than to yourself. Alu will transfer more vibration than a steel or carbon frame but it has different benefits

  • Yep happy to close thread. Mash made it in.

    That Look is neat, but I think it's the fine tarmac that sells it.

  • Btw anti-compact, did you just come up with that? I just realised I adopted the term without thinking lolz

  • So in this case it's the other way around, you reduce seatpost flex at the cost of frame stiffness. So it all kind of equals out except the anti-compact geo of the Mash uses a lot more material which adds unnecessary weight which means Mash is still fail but pot holes aren't more of a hazard.

    No. Less stiff if anything.

    This explains the main motivations for compact geo.

    Not mentioned is the slight comfort benefits you can get with a long exposed carbon seatpost.

  • Btw anti-compact, did you just come up with that? I just realised I adopted the term without thinking lolz

    Yes. And it's anti-compact™ to you.

    :)

  • Potholes are more a hazard to your rims and innertubes than to yourself. Alu will transfer more vibration than a steel or carbon frame but it has different benefits

    I know all this don't worry. I was the one saying that pot holes aren't more hazardous to a Mash than a comparable bike without the anti-compact geo. Owning a steel, alu and carbon road bike I know using different materials with diferent characteristics as far as stiffness goes doesn't necessarily affect comfort.

  • Having both anti compact and compact I can concur the anti compact is murda. (faster)

  • (faster)

    You mean looks faster?

  • No. Less stiff if anything.

    This explains the main motivations for compact geo.

    Not mentioned is the slight comfort benefits you can get with a long exposed carbon seatpost.

    Yeah that's what I'm saying, the mash frame reduces seatpost flex but the frame is less stiff.

    Having both anti compact and compact I can concur the anti compact is murda. (faster)

    As much as I admire your courage for coming in here and admit you have a Mash I really doubt this somehow. Is your other bike a Vigorelli perchance? A direct comparison between the two might convince me.

  • Maintained average about 3-5mph more on anti-compact. (On flat)

    Something to do with being over the pedals more than aero i think.

    Other is Giant TCR btw.

  • I like very much how your all using anti-compact™ but you all owe me royalties.

  • Ordinata i've got a Giant TCR and have to put the saddle quite far forward because the ST is something like 72.5° (or something pretty slack/comfy).

  • Mine is not far off limit (Forward). Still Mash geo faster for me on flat. No doubt.

  • I figure the angle of the top tube isn't the only difference between the TCR and Mash. If you own both bikes right now, I doubt they're set up the same way. If the Mash replaced the TCR, you've probably gotten better at cycling. I refuse to believe an anti-compact™ (sorry miro) bike will be faster than the exact same bike with horizontal or compact top tube.

    Is the TCR a track frame? I recently bought myself one of those (early 2000's if I'm not mistaken) in mint condition really, haven't built it up yet though.

  • Post a reply
    • Bold
    • Italics
    • Link
    • Image
    • List
    • Quote
    • code
    • Preview
About

Bike porn

Posted by Avatar for Velocio @Velocio

Actions