-
• #52627
cycle around them?
Or jump 'em.
-
• #52628
if that cinelli is aluminum, pot holes must be horrendous?
aluminum being stiff doesn't make it uncomfortable, it depend on how the framebuilder build/design it rather.
(as nail said, just cycle around them, even if you have an MTB).
-
• #52629
In this case with form over function?
-
• #52630
-
• #52631
Near perfect. Shall I close the thread?
-
• #52632
yes please do
-
• #52633
The anti-compact geometry.
I don't think anti-compact is necessarily stiffer than compact, otherwise I'm sure a lot of manufacturers would offer anti-compact frames, which is quite the opposite of the current trend.
-
• #52634
Compact offers a stiffer frameset but then you have seatpost flex which gives some comfort.
-
• #52635
Yep, as oz says.
-
• #52636
So in this case it's the other way around, you reduce seatpost flex at the cost of frame stiffness. So it all kind of equals out except the anti-compact geo of the Mash uses a lot more material which adds unnecessary weight which means Mash is still fail but pot holes aren't more of a hazard.
-
• #52637
Potholes are more a hazard to your rims and innertubes than to yourself. Alu will transfer more vibration than a steel or carbon frame but it has different benefits
-
• #52638
Yep happy to close thread. Mash made it in.
That Look is neat, but I think it's the fine tarmac that sells it.
-
• #52639
Btw anti-compact, did you just come up with that? I just realised I adopted the term without thinking lolz
-
• #52640
So in this case it's the other way around, you reduce seatpost flex at the cost of frame stiffness. So it all kind of equals out except the anti-compact geo of the Mash uses a lot more material which adds unnecessary weight which means Mash is still fail but pot holes aren't more of a hazard.
No. Less stiff if anything.
This explains the main motivations for compact geo.
Not mentioned is the slight comfort benefits you can get with a long exposed carbon seatpost.
-
• #52641
Btw anti-compact, did you just come up with that? I just realised I adopted the term without thinking lolz
Yes. And it's anti-compact™ to you.
:)
-
• #52642
Potholes are more a hazard to your rims and innertubes than to yourself. Alu will transfer more vibration than a steel or carbon frame but it has different benefits
I know all this don't worry. I was the one saying that pot holes aren't more hazardous to a Mash than a comparable bike without the anti-compact geo. Owning a steel, alu and carbon road bike I know using different materials with diferent characteristics as far as stiffness goes doesn't necessarily affect comfort.
-
• #52643
Having both anti compact and compact I can concur the anti compact is murda. (faster)
-
• #52644
(faster)
You mean looks faster?
-
• #52645
No. Less stiff if anything.
This explains the main motivations for compact geo.
Not mentioned is the slight comfort benefits you can get with a long exposed carbon seatpost.
Yeah that's what I'm saying, the mash frame reduces seatpost flex but the frame is less stiff.
Having both anti compact and compact I can concur the anti compact is murda. (faster)
As much as I admire your courage for coming in here and admit you have a Mash I really doubt this somehow. Is your other bike a Vigorelli perchance? A direct comparison between the two might convince me.
-
• #52646
Maintained average about 3-5mph more on anti-compact. (On flat)
Something to do with being over the pedals more than aero i think.
Other is Giant TCR btw.
-
• #52647
I like very much how your all using anti-compact™ but you all owe me royalties.
-
• #52648
Ordinata i've got a Giant TCR and have to put the saddle quite far forward because the ST is something like 72.5° (or something pretty slack/comfy).
-
• #52649
Mine is not far off limit (Forward). Still Mash geo faster for me on flat. No doubt.
-
• #52650
I figure the angle of the top tube isn't the only difference between the TCR and Mash. If you own both bikes right now, I doubt they're set up the same way. If the Mash replaced the TCR, you've probably gotten better at cycling. I refuse to believe an anti-compact™ (sorry miro) bike will be faster than the exact same bike with horizontal or compact top tube.
Is the TCR a track frame? I recently bought myself one of those (early 2000's if I'm not mistaken) in mint condition really, haven't built it up yet though.
The anti-compact geometry.