-
• #39326
-
• #39327
^^ Epic.
-
• #39328
I would like to see your bike :)
https://www.lfgss.com/post1281099-25256.html,https://www.lfgss.com/post1586243-33528.html, among many others.
-
• #39329
http://www.lfgss.com/post1281099-25256.html,http://www.lfgss.com/post1586243-33528.html, among many others.
:) Nice. I like the Koga, looks fast and that drop is huge.
Bikes like that would cost a lot of money here :) I also like your "Many others" section. -
• #39330
-
• #39331
Yep. Fair cop
-
• #39332
-
• #39333
She will be mine, oh yes, she will be mine
1 Attachment
-
• #39334
-
• #39335
http://www.lfgss.com/post1281099-25256.html,http://www.lfgss.com/post1586243-33528.html, among many others.
well and truly baited. well done.
-
• #39336
She will be mine, oh yes, she will be mineT4?
Like this one but with Aerobars?
To what extent do cervelo develop their "T" bikes for the track, as opposed to adjusting their existing TT frames? Interesting to see how they've integrated the P4's water bottle into the frame design. -
• #39337
-
• #39338
-
• #39339
-
• #39340
-
• #39341
There's reposts...I know. Enjoy.
-
• #39342
is that specifically 32 hole is unadvisable or all radials in general?
I was questioning the symmetrical point made by others: Front wheel ≠ rear wheel.
They shouldn't look the same, should they?
The front and rear wheels do very different jobs, so no they should'nt look the same, in my mind. I even used fatter stiffer spokes on the rear wheel of my latest wheelset for this reason.
Saying that, I have identically laced wheels front and back on three of my wheelsets. This is for the highly technical reason, that it enabled me to by bulk spoke lengths, saving money, and making it easier to keep spares.
Tune only warranty their front hub for radial lacing, in its 24 hole or less formats. Basically the more drillings the hub has, the less resiliant it is to the extra forces associaed with radial lacing. These are weight weenie hubs (albeit solid ones) though, so maybe the ones on the Charge have thicker flanges.
-
• #39343
Uncalled-for.
Indeed. That colour scheme is fucking horrific.
-
• #39344
Duell is awesome, beautiful handmade lightweight steelframes. Although this colorscheme isn't one of their best..
-
• #39345
I agree Erik. Lovely frames, but that colour scheme is horrifying.
-
• #39346
The paint is awesome, bit bronze/green flipflop. And yes, it's steel. Some of the nostalgic cats on here will probably like it a lot more all of a sudden now.
-
• #39347
is that specifically 32 hole is unadvisable or all radials in general?
I was questioning the symmetrical point made by others: Front wheel ≠ rear wheel.
They shouldn't look the same, should they?
Sorry, I wasn't very clear. I didn't mean that the front and rear have to match exactly - ie 3x/3x. Just that aesthetically there needs to be some visual symmetry. Like 4x/3x, 3x/2x, half radial/radial, etc. A 32h 3x/radial just looks a bit silly to me.
And as for less holes on the front, unless its a cheaper wheelset with less options, I think thats the way I'll go for any future options.
Oh and everything smallflurry said back there.
Oh and currently I'm perving on Parlee's:
EDIT: In fact I have just realised that this is my current dream bike. Bootiquey carbon, SRAM red, and edge finishing kit.
-
• #39348
Even if we liked your photography, the bike is horrid.
Titty-titty-bum-bum
-
• #39349
The Duell frameset is both awsome and beautiful. The yellow decal'd Zipps are screwing it up.
-
• #39350
It looks, ever so slightly, like a chocolate bar though.