Bike porn

Really? The carbon Look with the Campag (style?) cranks? FAIL IMO. Lovely bike but should have relevant crank.

and pedals

what it is like when in a porn movie the girls are wearing trainers, yes it is a fail, but yes it is still porn

i bet rik keeps his boots on

That black LOOK seems to be set up for the street, look at the low GI, looks about 70

FAIL>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

saddle looks pretty low too. It could be so good, but not quite. It does look a bit like a spaceship though, which is ace.

those cranks make it look like Space Station MIR os opposed to Appollo, so what Pisti said, really >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

and it's a repost from anti- anyway :))

Posting it in Porn and anti isn't a repost. Get back to your haters thread.

Its a multiple pea roast in this thread too

Its a multiple pea roast in this thread too

^^^^
This

how would this work?

as far as i see it, if you wanted to lengthen or shorten the rear end, you would do so at the expense of stretching or compressing the seat stays, thus changing geometry and weakening the frame. please correct me if i'm wrong or this has been covered but it seems to have very little advantage over an eno hub or cranks

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2769/4443766005_78d9946786_b.jpg

Nice and fugly...

Its a multiple pea roast in this thread too

Silence! That is entirely beside the point.

as far as i see it, if you wanted to lengthen or shorten the rear end, you would do so at the expense of stretching or compressing the seat stays, thus changing geometry and weakening the frame. please correct me if i'm wrong or this has been covered but it seems to have very little advantage over an eno hub or cranks

Isn't it allowed because Ti can flex and always return to shape? Presumably only for minute adjustments...

It will work, based on what we know about pivotless Ti chainstays of soft tail MTBs there should be no material problem with moving about an inch in chainstay length. On the other hand, deliberately introducing a weak joint in the middle of highly stressed chainstays seems like a dumb idea; it's at least as ugly as sliding dropouts or an eccentric BB and just as susceptible to the kind of creaking which has been adduced as a pitfall of the EBB. With careful design, it's not even necessary to employ either an eccentric BB or a calliper mounted on sliding dropouts to fit a disc brake to a single speed. The total rangle of movement need be no more than ½", and putting the calliper centre directly over the axle centre will permit that without any further need for adjusting the calliper position, since moving the wheel back or forward ¼" generates an effective change of calliper position of just 0.2mm radially and 4° in angle, well within the tolerance for calliper mounting.

woah!

Awesome.

It will work, based on what we know about pivotless Ti chainstays of soft tail MTBs there should be no material problem with moving about an inch in chainstay length. On the other hand, deliberately introducing a weak joint in the middle of highly stressed chainstays seems like a dumb idea; it's at least as ugly as sliding dropouts or an eccentric BB and just as susceptible to the kind of creaking which has been adduced as a pitfall of the EBB. With careful design, it's not even necessary to employ either an eccentric BB or a calliper mounted on sliding dropouts to fit a disc brake to a single speed. The total rangle of movement need be no more than ½", and putting the calliper centre directly over the axle centre will permit that without any further need for adjusting the calliper position, since moving the wheel back or forward ¼" generates an effective change of calliper position of just 0.2mm radially and 4° in angle, well within the tolerance for calliper mounting.

^^My head hurts now..
Said it once, will say it again tester.... you need to get out more ; )

he says 4 degrees my abacus says 5 degrees ?
wtf ?

he says 4 degrees my abacus says 5 degrees ?
wtf ?

Depends what assumption you make about rotor diameter.

let me tell you know it adds up to cock twat cock and more twat... get out of tester's thrall you imbeciles and realise it's not about the millilmetres and the percentile thrust ratios and the etc etc this and that, it's about whether it looks cool or not. this is what porn should be about, not cocking minutiae formulas and all that guff...

pity of the bars

yeah, well the beauty of these ones is that they come off and can be changed when required.

I've got a heap of bars for it but am waiting on the right stem to pop up.

that is your bike?

off to the naughty step, you can not post your bike in the porn thread, is a bit bad manners
I see that your a newie, better place to put it will be here