Bike porn

...and then someone who saw it in current project will put it in bike porn.

says don't you work at Evans? (@ readview).

oops,like i said,first time in this thread,is it out of order putting up stuff you own?

As a matter of principle you shouldn't post your own stuff anyway here, it's pretentiousness to assume that someone else will get aroused by your 'wife's' pictures.
But that's just me.

Bhw!2k~$(KGrHqN,!jEEv1+0LUQOBMDO-8T(kw~~_3.JPG)

EJgEWk~$(KGrHqR,!jIEv1+0L,!yBMDO+GSQg!~~_3.JPG)

EKgEWk~$(KGrHqR,!i!Ev1+0EN0QBMDO+GV-cg~~_14.JPG)

http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/GIOS-Torino-Professional-Campagnolo-50-th-annivesary-/110543409986?cmd=ViewItem&pt=LH_DefaultDomain_0&hash=item19bce69342

original link

No,i run a volvo specialist garage up north (accrington),used to work in a couple of bike shops but that was 28 years ago so i dont think you'll know me from there!

...and then someone who saw it in current project will put it in bike porn.

says don't you work at Evans? (@ readview).

Gutted it's been sold,i'd have bought that in a heartbeat!

Gazelle Gold Line Racing
Early 90's, Reynolds 653 steel, Noblex stainless steel blades and tail.

little bit more info here: http://www.classicbikeshop.eu/Classic-frames.html (scrowll daan a bit)

Is anyone else bore of the readers wives bullshit?

If your bike is actually pretty post it here, who gives a fuck, provided it actually is a pretty bike.
If your bike is a piece of shit, no matter how much you love it, accept that others will not and you shouldn't post it here.

Effectively, you are all bitching about which particular set of pixels should be used to post pictures of fucking bikes. If I were you I'd be pretty concerned for my mental health.

but visually unaware people post their shitty bikes.

Arsene Wenger: "everyone thinks they have the prettiest wife at home"

Gazelle Gold Line Racing
Early 90's, Reynolds 653 steel, Noblex stainless steel blades and tail.

little bit more info here: http://www.classicbikeshop.eu/Classic-frames.html (scrowll daan a bit)

I'm glad that said SOLD or my credit card was getting hammered. That's my favorite frame in this whole thread.

With any thread entitled 'porn' there's always going to inconsistency in regard to subjectivity.
On the whole, i think we're (including myself) a discerning bunch.

Personally I find the use of the word 'porn' in the thread title tiring and infantile.

[/po-faced bore]

I also find it hilarious that people defend/attack the content of it by comparing it, analogously, to how they feel about actual pornography...

"well I have jerked off to slack grannies before and so, while I understand why your antique path racer won't appeal to everyone, I don't see why it shouldn't be posted" etc.

slack grannies

ha! I really hope that is a real mag.

but visually unaware people post their shitty bikes.
Great. Ignore them. If you really must, and only if you cannot stop yourself, then take the piss. It's really not that difficult.
(Not aimed at Smyth specifically).

Additionally, people will post absolutely vile bikes which they don't own too. Enforcing a no readers wives rule will not ensure that the bikes featured are actually beautiful.

Enforcing a no readers wives rule will not ensure that the bikes featured are actually beautiful.

But it does at least force people to objectify what they're posting, which is consistent with the porn meme.

Hello Dave!

Great. Ignore them. If you really must, and only if you cannot stop yourself, then take the piss. It's really not that difficult.
(Not aimed at Smyth specifically).

Additionally, people will post absolutely vile bikes which they don't own too. Enforcing a no readers wives rule will not ensure that the bikes featured are actually beautiful.

^^sounds like common sense to me!^^

But it does at least force people to objectify what they're posting, which is consistent with the porn meme.
Doesn't stop you bitching about almost every single bike posted here though does it?

As someone who's been on the forum for less than a year, can you explain why everybody should bow to your obviously superior taste/knowledge/whatever the fuck it is that makes you queen of the porn thread?

Doesn't stop you bitching about almost every single bike posted here though does it?

Count the bikes. Now count the ones I make any kind of comment about. Divide one number by the other and see how close it is to unity. Then fuck off.

As someone who's been on the forum for less than a year

Count the days since December 2008. Then count the number of days in a year. Divide....etc.

Porn and Popcorn do not really go well together.

Unless you just gonna get the flamethrowers out and fuk the hole shit up.

hides

Count the days since December 2008. Then count the number of days in a year. Divide....etc.

also maybe take a look at member numbers as well and then make your comment.

PS - no need to tell me to fuck off because we all already know you're going to do it

Count the bikes. Now count the ones I make any kind of comment about. Divide one number by the other and see how close it is to unity. Then fuck off.

Count the days since December 2008. Then count the number of days in a year. Divide....etc.

I knew I could count on a poorly thought out and uneducated response.

just lolled a little....

readview - is that a new Hetchins?

not to sure if i really like this but it is kinda interesting

just lolled a little....

readview - is that a new Hetchins?

Yes-ish,it's a new old stock '92 frameset that i built up with campag 50th stuff that was mainly nos or mint used.Rides nice but only when it's not raining which is about two weeks of the year up here!