On One Pompino owners...

The paint job I believed is likely to be powdercoated, mine never had a single chip (lots of mark but no scratch).

Mine is a large, still 120 rear spacing. the top tube is 55-56 depending on where you measure it.

yeah if you level that picture up V4 is heap slack.

some people been saying the old pomp geo chart was complitely wrong and never fixed

This is what I've always thought. It was much slacker than the chart would make you think. I wonder if the new version is actually closer to the old geo chart...It looks like they've moved towards a more 'standard' geo 73/73.5 HA/SA.

I always wondered whether, when they changed the fork design (with longer A-C length), they never changed the frame, resulting in raised BB, and super slack angles and an explanation for the wrong chart...just conjecture though...

Geo tab has arrived on the On-One site, no idea if this is accurate/up to date...

Geo tab has arrived on the On-One site, no idea if this is accurate/up to date...

It's incomplete.

No BB drop.

No stack/reach.

Doesn't declare whether the standover height is measured through the BB centre as hinted by the diagram.

No fork spec.

No fork spec.

Probably because there's no fork pictured...

Probably because there's no fork pictured...

Comes with a fork.

Probably because there's no fork pictured...

Comes with a fork.

Headangle is meaningless without defining at least one of those variables.

Comes with a fork.

I meant they're too lazy to open some hyped up version of Paint and draw it in the picture as the frames previously came without the fork.

The URL for the geo picture on the old and new frames is the same (for all there frames even), but the numbers in the table do differ.

My new frame has arrived.

It came with forks which was a surprise.....will have to send the other pomp forks i ordered back.

il get some pics up in a bit.

Same geo as the Kaffenback 2 then.

Or did On-one fuck it up again?

AFAIK they never had stack/reach on their chart.

Same geo as the Kaffenback 2 then.

The Kaffenback 2 has 415mm stays, Pomp4 has 420mm...

From what i gather -

All -1 degree HT, .5+ ST, -5mm CS
S,M & XL +10mm ETT L+15mm ETT

I'm on a V3 L now. Its a shame the V4 doesnt have a taller HT combined wit hthe longer ETT. YMMV but even @ 72.5. the ST is way to slack for me. No wonder you ride smaller frames with huge seat-bar gaps...

It got a long fork, so the headtube compensate for that.

72.5 mean in-line post.

on-one site says the V3 pompino has a 73° head tube witch isn't true.
With original forks it's 72°. So no changes there on the V4

72.5 degree ST is only half to one degree slacker to most mass market OTP?

ive got pretty short legs and long arms. So, in most cases i need a frame with a steep STA and long TT.

Why steep STA? unless you mean the standard (73/74).

Yup standard..

some pics, hopefully help you guys see the angles/lengths

5 Attachments

moar

frame is an xl. measurements are c-t-c and are as good as i could get trying to hold the tape, balance the frame and take a picture!

2 Attachments

ordered some new parts for my pomp. A few days ago..
as yet no email to say dispatched, are they just getting slower on this stuff?

I now live in Canada, when I was in the UK they were pretty quick.

whats the biggest tyre people are running on their pomps?

It would depend on the gearing and chain length ie position of the rear axle in the track ends. This site, http:// http://www.bikeradar.com/forums/viewtopic.php?p=17212964, has a good picture of a pompino with a 32 mm CX tyre. There is not much clearance with the tyre used which if I understand the post (4th down) was modified.

I run 25 mm and the frame could easily take 28 mm.