My new baby!

Posted on
Page
of 3
First Prev
/ 3
  • I think Multi Grooves is correct.

    I am 6'-5'' and very flexible (palms flat when touching toes sort of thing!) and like my handlebars quite low. That frame has a 17cm headtube and would be too short for me.

    You will need a lot of quill stem showing to get the bars at the right level.

    IMO, you will need a 64/65cm frame with a 20cm+ headtube.

  • 6'5" with a 72cm inside leg makes you a funny shape. I'm 6'2" with a lanky 92cm leg, and wouldn't look at a frame less than 62cm.

    If it fits it will be a good bike. A Donovan built frame won't be duff. But a word of caution; don't go buying loads of stuff until you have the frame and some verniers. Getting brakes without knowing the brake drop is a bit of a risk, but should be ok. The ones you have indicated will need some judicious drilling/fitting/bodging/mis-matching of allen nuts to work, but do-able if the reach is right.

    The seller seems to be muddled on what year it was made. WB7 for that frame is January 1987 (probably), unless they've missed out a number.

    Good luck with it, and as the hayterzgonnahate suggest, UTFS a lot, it works.

  • Well, the current ride is a Boardman Urban Pro in a very generic "large" size - had to raise the seat a bit but it works fine! My last bike was a 22" which equals 48.6 or something very similar - 60cm will be huge.

  • Why do people bother buying bikes that don't fit?

  • To Sam's credit, he did choose a large frame though, which is better than normal sized people buying 61cm frame thinking it'd fit them a la the cuntest, idiotic, pathetic Johnny Lau in his full virgin reeked glory;

  • Well, the current ride is a Boardman Urban Pro in a very generic "large" size - had to raise the seat a bit but it works fine! My last bike was a 22" which equals 48.6 or something very similar - 60cm will be huge.

    Are you sure to the best of my knowledge 22" equates to 55cm or thereabouts?

  • 48.6 would be suitable for someone who's 5'4 or under.

  • nice frame that, i had a raleigh in a 60 and im 6"2 and it was fine, just go with an upswept quill and youll get the height you need for the bars

  • nice frame that, i had a raleigh in a 60 and im 6"2 and it was fine...

    it's probably because you're 6'2 and not 6'5.

  • Well, according to the boardman site, my bike is 54cm seat tube, 61.5 cm sloping top tube and 17.5cm headtube. Fits fine, certainly no discomfort and it goes like the clappers.

  • That because the boardman have a sloped top tube and not a horizontal one, measurement may varies between those two, if 61cm is the effective top tube length, then the Raleigh should fit you fine.

  • Ed, why did you pay for a cycle fit when you can just diagnose it online?

  • something along the lines of "those who can't, teach" I would imagine

  • Ed, why did you pay for a cycle fit when you only ride short distance commutes and pedal like a chimpanzee humping a beach ball?

    He's a millionaire, gotta find something to spend his money on once Evans run out of utility bikes.

  • More pictures fellow, eBay has ended. I'm thinking you might be fool to have it powdercoated if it's NOS?

    Edit: Scrolled down and there it was, don't have it powdercoated you cunt!

  • it's probably because you're 6'2 and not 6'5.

    it was originally my brothers who is 6"5 all i did was put the stock seat post and quill back in and ta da

    he did twat his knees on the drops tho

  • Nice frame, envious I am struggling to find anything I like!!

  • you got it yet?

  • Post a reply
    • Bold
    • Italics
    • Link
    • Image
    • List
    • Quote
    • code
    • Preview
About

My new baby!

Posted by Avatar for samluk84 @samluk84

Actions