-
• #2552
We're impatient!
[although I agree with GA2G tbh, I did my Hero when I was on 1.5, which was actually pretty much unusable, as it was so poorly coded]
-
• #2553
well now you've put the fear in me. I suppose I could wait...
-
• #2554
It shouldn't be a problem, its just there are other things I would do with a brand new phone, and once you've spent a couple of days using 2.1, you might realise that getting 2.2 isn't much of an issue
Its like buying a brand new OTP bike, then the next day re-building the wheels with new spokes: good but just go out and ride!
-
• #2555
It shouldn't be a problem, its just there are other things I would do with a brand new phone, and once you've spent a couple of days using 2.1, you might realise that getting 2.2 isn't much of an issue
Its like buying a brand new OTP bike, then the next day re-building the wheels with new spokes: good but just go out and ride!
Since you put it that way...
Whilst I'm on here though, best Android app i've gotten so far is London Journey - essentially the TFL website in your hand with GPS.
-
• #2556
For those waiting for a decent Android tablet, Toshiba are said to be launching a 10 inch version. Looks like it might be interesting.
-
• #2557
For those waiting for a decent Android tablet, Toshiba are said to be launching a 10 inch version. Looks like it might be interesting.
zing!
-
• #2558
I'm on 1.6, and yet some of you are whinging that you're on 2.1, not 2.2. Really?
You knew you were going to be stuck on 1.6 before you got it
-
• #2559
I did, and I'm not rushing. It does what I need it to. ;]
-
• #2560
Got bored. Doing this: http://www.mikesouthby.co.uk/2010/08/htc-desire-downgrading-hboot-and-installing-custom-froyo-rom/
Downgrade HBoot
Downgrade ROM
Install Unrevoked recovery
Install OpenDesire 3.6.0No need for gold card because I had a sim-free Desire. Just found OpenDesire v4 so I might put that on now.
-
• #2561
Bored with that too. Going for Modaco's Desire Froyo r8 build.
-
• #2562
Looks like the Desire is last weeks news....
YouTube- ê°¤ëŸì‹œS vs HTC Desire 3D 게임 비êµ, Galaxy S
! -
• #2563
No, it looks like you are posting last month's news.
We've been through the comparisons already, multiple times. The Galaxy S has faster 3D graphics, as has been stated about a hundred times in this thread.
My gf's brother has one now so I finally got to play with it and the Desire is loads faster than it in normal use. I don't play games so HTC FTW.
Desire 46.574 MFLOPS vs. Galaxy S 14.587 MFLOPS:
http://www.greenecomputing.com/apps/linpack/linpack-by-device/ -
• #2564
Repost.
Goddammit Mergatron, you beat me!!!!
;)
-
• #2565
And if anything made the Desire old news, I would assume it would be the impending [?] release of the Desire HD, rather than a phone by another manufacturer
-
• #2566
In today's Evening Standard, there is an advert for MALEFORCE MOBILE. It's an app for getting gay men together. Available from the Android Store and in iTunes. Didn't somebody say that they wanted to create a sex app? Genius.
If the hit-counter now goes through the roof, I'll know where all the naughty boys are. ;)
-
• #2567
I dont see the big deal. If they have an OKCupid app, why not for the same gender?
-
• #2568
I want the lesbian app. Everything else is of no interest to me.
-
• #2569
The ghey is for fags
... and hipsters
-
• #2570
And to think we're in the 21st century. rolls eyes
-
• #2571
And to think we're in the 21st century. rolls eyes
Get a sense of humour - its an ironic statement...!? I learned it from a ghey friend of mine.
Do I need to explain it for you?
-
• #2572
I have a sense of humour, I just don't find it funny when it's in a sense of like, OH A GAY APP ROFL LOLZ. That's all. Maybe I dont feel the need to out them here
-
• #2573
I have HTC Sense of humour.
That was a very bad android joke. Thankyou. Try the fish.
-
• #2574
GA2G already did the lesbian joke hippy
-
• #2575
But no-one repped me. Mergatron knew this, so he's attempting to get reps for the same lame joke. All hail Mergatron. ;)
I'm on 1.6, and yet some of you are whinging that you're on 2.1, not 2.2. Really?