-
• #1477
Agreed
-
• #1478
I mean the vaccine shambles thats been doing the round the last few days, that doesn't make them look like spoilt brats at all.
A row with a supplier over €300,000,000 cash in exchange for not very much (so far) in terms of the goods promised doesn't make their comms or their contract writing look good, but to say that this one spat undermines the economic and political foundations of the entire bloc is, I would say, over-selling it somewhat.
It's also only being cast in terms of Brexit in the UK, for obvious reasons that we are desperate to find anything we can show as a Brexit benefit.
-
• #1479
Can you imagine them going anywhere else in the UK!
“Here Torquay, we are just going to pop these nukes in a bay round the corner”
“Aye, very good”
No where else would take them, it’s a crime they are there!
-
• #1480
Still no one has answered my q about the branch office leaders in Scotchland, that’s how effective the opposition parties are.
-
• #1481
No where else would take them
No one in Kent wanted to wake up living next to a lorry park - they'll get put where the government wants to put them with zero say from the locals.
-
• #1482
Nissan staying put after a massive subsidy, woohoo! Strike 1 for BJ.
-
• #1483
I’d take a lorry park over death machines any day.
-
• #1484
But that's telling in of itself - Nissan not leaving is shown as a huge victory, not Nissan investing hundreds of millions in a new production line, but just not shutting up and fucking off is now presented as a success.
-
• #1485
Scotland is a colony. It’s only called a union to square the white supremacy / white mans burden circle. Until you start framing it like this it will never make sense.
-
• #1486
Agreed, absolute shambles spun to make it look good. All those guys in Sunderland who voted for it until they were given redundancy notices, I wonder what they think now?
-
• #1487
Would you have a link to the FT article? Don’t recall reading that one in particular.
Thanks.
-
• #1488
Agreed. It’s an occupied colony, same as northern Ireland and Wales. Sooner the ‘union’ is dismantled the better.
-
• #1489
That's a narrow lens to view through..
-
• #1490
Would you have a link to the FT article? Don’t recall reading that one in particular.
Thanks.
https://www.ft.com/content/cc6b0d9a-d8cc-4ddb-8c57-726df018c10e?shareType=nongift
-
• #1491
Which end of the lens are you at?
-
• #1492
yoon alert
-
• #1493
Read my previous, I think you’ll find otherwise.
-
• #1494
LOL
-
• #1495
My reasons for supporting the current status quo are neatly summarised here (figures which Dirty Deek wanted to reframe)..
Source https://www.gov.scot/publications/government-expenditure-revenue-scotland-gers-2019-20/pages/1/
1 Attachment
-
• #1496
So we’re too poor?
-
• #1497
Looks like you're not able to afford to rule yourselves, and have to accept being ruled by Boris if you don't want to starve.
-
• #1498
A Scots pal of mine is an ardent independence advocate, and a life-long left-winger. He’s left Labour behind and is fully behind the SNP, but that means that he’s had to get behind a collective that includes some pretty right-wing types, which really doesn’t sit well with me.
I don’t know enough about the make-up of the SNP, but we all know what comes to mind if you think of English Nationalists. Where does the SNP sit in the political spectrum?
-
• #1499
Any reference to the IMF bailout in 1976, prevailing economic conditions, membership of the EU and justifications for Brexit for those who oppose Scots Indy are of course forbidden.
-
• #1500
Indeed, and doff our glengarrys and be eternally grateful for being part of his brigadoon theme park.
I’d be delighted if the nukes were relocated out of Scotland, an absolute waste of money when successive governments were obsessed with cutting taxes at the expense of the welfare of its citizens while keeping this nice little earner for a relatively small number of people.