-
• #9127
I thought it was an interesting question. Mainly because it shows how fixed my position is - it's so difficult to to accept the premise; "regardless of how likely", which I assume is the way leave voters feel.
-
• #9128
Baby boomers, as a cohort, benefited from free education, generous welfare and cheap housing, then voted for parties which denied those things to their kids.
What would be interesting to know would be what the actual % of those who benefited from those advantages have gone on to vote against them for subsequent generations.
-
• #9129
Although the free education thing is a bit of a red herring. Current university numbers are about five times higher than in those years, only about 10% of those baby boomers had the advantage of free university education.
-
• #9130
The Remainer questions are more loaded and difficult to interpret in that survey I think.
The ones to the Leavers are simple - some %age of respondants would take economic damage over the status quo.
The Remainer ones though? I assume they're not referring to the status quo, but to the effect of leaving.
So 34% would take economic damage in excess of what they perceive the effect of leaving to be? Or they'd take some damage as they don't think it would be as bad as leaving? -
• #9131
Five times higher, but way more expensive. I'd like to see a source for that 10% - sure living expenses and so on, but I don't remember whether university fees were levied at the individuals attending.
-
• #9133
Aah yes - I misread your post as being only 10% of Boomer university attendees did so for free.
-
• #9134
Well that just satirizes itself, doesn't it... :)
-
• #9135
It wasn't just free University education,
which when I finished school in '78 was claimed to be for only the top 4%.
Polytechnics and Institutes of Higher & Further education took broadly similar numbers,
and,
there was extensive provision of Day Release and Evening classes that led to vocational qualifications, including true/proper apprenticeships. -
• #9136
Expect a DM headline soon;
'Border control queues: Do they cause cancer & reduce house prices?' -
• #9137
"Border control queues: causing mass illegal immigration"
-
• #9138
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kaj6f5KbWC0
of COURSE and all of that
-
• #9139
Diana was in favour of Brexit. You've gotta love The Daily Express.
-
• #9140
-
• #9141
Surely that's a spoof...
-
• #9142
Moderately interesting
Based on this lecture apparently
https://www.gresham.ac.uk/lectures-and-events/britain-and-the-eu-in-or-out-one-year-on
-
• #9144
Pantomime villain Nick Timothy has written his much-hyped first column for The Telegraph
It's paywalled, but you can read the start, and the opening paragraphs suggest a distorted sense of his own abilities, and a general failure to grasp reality. No great surprise really. I can't imagine the rest pf the article is worth reading.
-
• #9145
I'm not too impressed because they keep going on about "camera solutions" yes but those aren't enough if you also want to end freedom of movement...
Also, goods smuggling will make a return if there are tariffs... people used to smuggle butter and cigarettes on the buses from the ROI not too long ago. Unfortunately smuggling funds criminals.
Good article on border camera solutions here..
https://www.theregister.co.uk/2017/05/11/anpr_for_uk_ireland_scotland_boarders/
-
• #9146
California Crops Rot as Immigration Crackdown Creates Farmworker Shortage. Hmmm...
-
• #9147
Nothing new:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nks2RKbNuVY
It's been going on for decades.
UK version:
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2017/aug/05/brexit-uk-food-industry-eu-fruit-veg-pickers
-
• #9148
Brexit art
-
• #9149
Don't think this has been linked;
https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2017/aug/09/brexit-political-party-james-chapman-david-davis
It seems like he's gone grey in the last year :)