-
-
-
-
-
-
Bought this last week off Amey - original post here.
Unfortunately slightly too small for me, just looking to get back what I paid for it so £370.
Pick up SE13.
-
@Fox have pm'd you if JvJ falls through
-
-
-
-
-
-
For sale, a lovely pair of nearly new red Louis Garneau Copal Road shoes, 2 bolt and 3 bolt compatible. These are absolutely perfect if you enjoy doing crits in drag or want to recreate Éric Barone's fateful attempt at being the fastest red gimp down the side of a volcano.
I can not with any certainty deny that these were not used in the filming of Oops I did it again.
Be fabulous!
Price dropped to £16.
Based in Lewisham but am near St. Paul's during weekdays, happy to drop off nearby too.
-
I've never used airport routers but a quick google tells me your default LAN IP is going to be 10.0.1.1. To check this, if you're using a windows machine go to the command line and type in ipconfig. If you're on linux, go to a command window and type ifconfig, on apple go to the terminal and type:
route get default | grep gatewayon all of these methods the gateway IP address is the one you want. Now type the gateway IP into your browser and you'll hopefully be presented with a login screen. Google tells me the default log in for your router is going to be:
publicIf you've changed it at some point, it'll be whatever you've changed it to. If it's not been changed, I'd recommend you do it. Once you're into your router there will hopefully be a fairly user friendly menu which will guide you to everything else - once you've turned UPnP off, it should be fairly secure but it might be worth checking to see if there's any specific port forwarding rules set up. There will be a table somewhere in the router settings which will outline any port forwarding rules that have been set up - if you haven't done these I wouldn't expect there to be any. If there are some and you don't know what they're for, make a note of them and then remove them. If anything stops working in your network, reintroduce the port forwarding rules until it starts to work again and then remove the unnecessary ones.
I wouldn't be too worried - turning UPnP off will stop the majority of things. It'll be worth rebooting your router once you've changed everything too just in case you have something like a mirai botnet malware which has infected your router - a simple reboot removes that malware.
I think the chromecast hack was just an exercise in vanity by some youtuber - there's been a few recently with printers and stuff like that. So don't worry too much, though I'd recommend burning your house down and changing your entire identity at least once every 5 years as a bare minimum.
-
-
-
-
-
I'm afraid I'm going to have to disagree with your support of 'deterrent' sentencing. You would have to agree that the ultimate 'deterrent' is threat of the death penalty no? However in America the murder rate in states with the death penalty has been consistently higher than in states without capital punishment since 1990.
Now I'm aware that yes, we don't live in America and it's an entirely different kettle of fish. However if you continue to push for more severe sentencing then you will ultimately end up getting an HGV driver trialled for murder to 'make an example' of him in order to prevent traffic accidents.
I think maybe you should strive to be humane rather than 'utilitarian' in these cases.
-
I don't see why you people are so angry about him not being convicted of dangerous driving? It would serve no purpose to convict the man.
A friend of mine lost his daughter in a road accident. She was a pedestrian and was hit by a lorry. She died, my friend lost his daughter. At the inquest he was expecting to feel anger towards the driver however he saw how it had destroyed the driver's life. He was a broken man.
I think those of you who are calling for him to punished more severely should seriously reconsider your positions. Ultimately it matters not what sentencing the driver receives, a young woman's life has been ruined also the drivers life has been ruined. Imagine waking up each day and having to live with the knowledge that you have torn a family apart and destroyed that womans life. That surely is punishment enough? It makes no difference what your criminal record states as many lives have been ruined, including the driver of the HGV. If he receives a more damaging sentence it's not going to make your morning commute more safe it's just going to further cause damage to him.
Don't think of drivers and cyclists, just think of people. People get hurt, physically and emotionally. I'm a person, I drive a car, I ride a bike. I would never like to be terminally damaged by getting knocked off my bike, I would also never like to be terminally damaged by knocking someone else off a bike.
-
-
Long time lurker...
I've got to disagree with you. This is just the first time he's been called out on it. He regularly dots his videos citing scientific method and facts either wrongly or just sometimes making it up. He states stuff with confidence and an air of superiority to make it seem legitimate and often it's just wrong. It's damaging, like in this instance it has the real possibility to damage the reputation of a company that has actually, unlike him, a level of scientific culpability.
I think it's lucky that he's decided to inflict himself only on the coffee world, if he decided to make videos about something other than coffee then he could be quite a dangerous communicator.
Sure, he's made a successful business out of roasting coffee but so have a lot of independent roasters. For everything else, I personally think he's a charlatan.