-
-
I don't think @eseman was blindly saying its a good idea or would solve the world's problems.
Making the post pointless at best.
Social problems are, by definition, people problems. Solutions have to start with people and their needs and behaviours. How technology might help shouldn't be the starting point. Just dropping "tech" into a political conversation is silly hand waving.
Also, dismissing a futurist theory because of teething problems with contemporary tech is not something that turns out to be the right approach usually.
The use of algorithms to distance people from the consequences of their actions is a significant problem right now. Which makes thoughtless invocation of tech for social problems truly deserving of a really big fucking kicking.Just quoting for posterity.
-
But you expect algorithms to provide answers to social problems.
No....? I expect algorithms to be a useful tool to enable better policy decisions to be made. We’re barely making use of one of the most powerful tools humanity has ever created to solve problems that profoundly affect peoples’ lives. It’s not a panacea, and I’m not suggesting it is. But there’s literally zero chance that a single human elected representative can even read and fully comprehend all the different legislation in a single congressional year and its wider impacts. To make things more difficult still, we expect that person to perform various other job functions, and be charismatic, and be helpful with our individual drama, and be impervious to self-benefitting corruption. That’s not going to happen.
However, there are probably parts of that job that can be made easier and improved by using the internet/computer algorithms to help compile, process and interweave mass data sets.
-
-
There’s several suggestions for making use of the tech. One that springs to mind is replacing or complementing human representatives with algorithms. Sounds bizarre but so is thinking a single human or a even a few thousand humans are able to identify which policy decisions are most beneficial for tens of millions of people.
Advertisers and bankers in the west already have online profiles for us, detailing our preferences and habits, our network connections, and myriad other pieces of info to give them a view into our minds, and to predict our preferences. Why not harness this tech to inform policy decisions?
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Sounds intense! Sorry to hear you had a breakdown, but good you’re recovering and have family support. As someone who also kind of quit their primary industry and is immeasurably happier for it, I hope you’re able to take things at a healthy pace and find something you really enjoy. What’s your background?
-
Any ideas on what my options are?
I don’t know Aliexpress’ own policies, but I’d politely insist to the seller that it 100% wasn’t received, and ask that they contact the courier company for more specific info or to start a claim.
If you used PayPal, you might be protected. If you used a bank card, you’re almost definitely protected. Shouldn’t take much effort from you to successfully dispute a charge, just be sure to provide some screenshots of your due diligence to strengthen your case.
-
-
Artists call them tube squeezers or paint saver keys. You could get one online from an arts supplier, I’m sure they could use the business.
E.g., no affiliation https://www.pegasusart.co.uk/tube-squeezer-paint-saver-keys-3-sizes-large.ir
-
-
-
-
-
Just for clarity, my previous post wasn’t directed at you.
Also- interesting link, gives some more specifics than I’d encountered, will forward.