-
• #4202
Typical of the man that he deprives us of the satisfaction of seeing him lose his seat on election night.
-
• #4203
Rest assured he knows his political career is over.
If there was a biggest U.K. Cunt award he’d be near the top.
-
• #4204
Of a big inverted pyramid
-
• #4205
TV, radio, investment banking, shadowy think-tank.
The world is his oyster. I hope he gets the shits.
-
• #4206
Signs of full on in-fighting and self-devouring of the government.
Supporters of BJ are threatening to organise and obstruct Rishi's government if he doesn't intervene to save DePffefeil from destruction via the hands of his own legal team, paid for by ... the government.
It's absolutely delicious, isn't it?
-
• #4207
Apart from it being us, the populace, who suffer everything they do and bankroll them. Venal arseholes.
-
• #4208
Supporters of BJ are threatening to organise and obstruct Rishi's government
I wonder if they'll be able to marshall more supporters than they managed against the NI protocol bill, that was rather sad and pathetic.
I don't think we're far off Labour being able to use Johnsons name in the same way the tory try an use Corbyn's.
(edit. sorry Bearlegged, didn't mean to @ you)
-
• #4209
us who ... bankroll them
I actually don't mind paying for a bit of Tory self destruction, it's a great spectacle when it kicks off properly
-
• #4210
The aim seems to be to have Sunak putting out so many fires daily that he can't create policy or govern. Doesn't matter if it is about a covid party or speeding fine.
-
• #4211
Lets not forget that Sunak is also currently under investigation for 2 ministerial breachs of ethics, its hard to keep up.
-
• #4212
.
1 Attachment
-
• #4213
Nothing to see here for Braverman. But I expect that's a considerable "Now shut the fuck up" from to her from Sunak.
-
• #4214
This article is hilarious. Apparently we should feel sorry for Tory MPs because they will lose their seats at the next election?
If they weren’t such a disaster for the country, and, on the whole, such objectionable cunts, we possibly might?
-
• #4215
it was written by Henry Hill, deputy editor of ConservativeHome
No idea why the guardian are giving him a platform, lolz I assume.
-
• #4216
If they weren’t such a disaster for the country, and, on the whole, such objectionable cunts, we possibly might?
Plus they get their nice little parachute payments and gold-plated (at a bare minimum) pensions...
Graun taking the write-an-article-most-readers-will-be-angry-about approach, most often used by other publications?
-
• #4217
Think of all the fruit picking opportunities.
Also.
Setting aside my cynicism, we shouldn’t just dismiss Raab’s stated reason: he does have young children, and it can’t be easy having your dad being a hate figure
He could avoid being a cunt?
-
• #4218
Boris Johnson has sacked the lawyers he wasn't paying for
-
• #4219
He’s hit the panic button?
-
• #4220
Boris Johnson has sacked the lawyers he wasn't paying for
Because they followed the protocols they were supposed to?
-
• #4221
Bloke down the pub reckons Camilla was at the Abba party.
-
• #4222
There were often claims of journalists and political editors not reporting the parties because they were, or knew of others, in attendance. The spotlight on Johnson overshadowed the actual story in the end.
-
• #4223
Bloke down the pub reckons Camilla was at the Abba party
Schofield and Willoughby were there too. Alongside Captain Tom's ghost.
-
• #4224
The Telegraph taking it well
1 Attachment
-
• #4225
I've seen it mentioned that Sue Gray was really trying to give Boris an easy ride but the powers of this enquiry to get evidence is something else entirely. If the chair thinks you are holding anything back that might even be tangentially related to a line of enquiry that's a criminal offence.
Not a moment too soon:
https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2023/may/22/dominic-raab-will-reportedly-stand-down-as-mp-at-next-election