-
• #52
Or can both be seen as a positive depending on the circumstance?
This. I don’t think there’s a single formula to a good cover. I always thought Nirvana were good at picking songs to cover. Love Buzz sounds so like a Nirvana song when they covered it, as did Man Who Sold The World and In The Pines. Also, for all their blatant
theftheavy borrowing, Led Zeppelin really knew how to take an existing song and just extrapolate it in their own way -
• #53
That’s certainly true…
-
• #54
Also Jesus doesn't want me for a Sun Beam, great cover
-
• #55
Same actor
2 Attachments
-
• #56
The red stuff that comes out of a rare steak isn’t blood
-
• #57
What is it? Cow juice?
-
• #58
Myoglobin, apparently 🤷♂️
-
• #59
That the largest owner of radio stations in the United States around the time of the September 11 attacks circulated an internal memo containing a list of songs that program directors felt were "lyrically questionable" to air following the attack. It included all Rage Against the Machine Songs among others.
-
• #60
That Campagnolo made the iconic Lamborghini Countach wheels. Noticed (and then googled) while watching this great documentary:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8b7erU_DOfE
1 Attachment
-
• #61
When Massachusetts declared slavery illegal, they also extended their residency laws to apply special regulation to non-slave people of colour trying to settle in the state - any people of colour, whether former slaves or travellers from abroad. But Moroccans had a free pass, because Morocco was the first Muslim state to recognise American independence.
These days, "Moorish Sovereign Citizens" use the early friendship between Morocco and the U.S. as the basis of their cray cray beliefs.
-
• #62
Your posts are usually worth chewing over, but the above is too confused for me right now.
-
• #63
- Massachusetts made slavery illegal in 1777.
- They already had residency laws, based on England's Poor Laws, restricting who could settle in the state. Like England's poor laws, the idea was that local authorities had an obligation to assist residents who fell into poverty, so it was made difficult to move in and become a resident if you weren't financially secure.
- They extended those laws to place special restrictions on people of colour. The primary reason was that newly freed slaves were thought likely to struggle to support themselves. But they applied those regulations to any non-white (racism or convenience or both, take your pick).
- Moroccans were exempt from those restrictions.
That was interesting enough to learn, but then there's the Moorish Sovereign Citizens. Who, as I said, are cray cray. I'd already heard of those, but the above bit of history turns out also to be part of their justification.
- Massachusetts made slavery illegal in 1777.
-
• #64
Thanks.
I'll read more tomorrow.
-
• #65
The cabaret artists who wrote the early gay pop song "Kay, Why?" were commissioned to write an opera for... Massey Ferguson. It was performed on a beach in Greece for a global corporate audience.
I grew up in a rural area where Massey Ferguson was a big name. Boys would argue about whether Massey Ferguson or Ford tractors were cooler. Mind blown.
-
• #66
No argument, Ford is way cooler.
-
• #67
L.S. Lowery hold the record for most honours declined, CH, CBE, OBE and a Knighthood.
I've alwais liked his work and today gone up in my estimation!
-
• #68
It went highery?
-
• #70
Mississippi racists once tried to cancel Bonanza
1 Attachment
-
• #71
The Old Vic theatre moved to Burnley during the Second World War
"The Old Vic and Sadler's Wells were forced to move out of their Waterloo Road Theatre at Finsbury Park, London because it was commandeered as a rest centre after being damaged by bombs. Jess Linscott, the manager of the Victoria Theatre on Hammerton Street, immediately offered the use of his premises to Jo Hodgkinson who had been sent north by Tyrone Guthrie (manager of the Old Vic and Sadler's Wells companies) to look for temporary headquarters. Guthrie travelled north and decided there and then that the theatre was suitable. The stalls, circle and gallery held 1800 seats and there was room for four to five hundred more standing. Prices ranged from 9d. in the gallery through to 3s.6d. in the orchestra stalls.
In January 1941 an eight week session of opera, ballet and drama was opened at Burnley Vic. The programme note signed by Guthrie and Linscott is worthy of note, "Burnley, with the combined session of opera, drama and ballet suddenly became the most creative centre in the English theatre". The first two weeks were given to the Sadler's Wells opera. the syllabus contained five works - 'The marriage of Figaro' , 'Hansel and Gretel', 'Die Fledermaus' and 'La Traviata'. The cast list featured Joan Gross, the prima donna of the Sadler's Wells and the leading English, if not European, operatic soprano of her day. Even this did not attarct Burnley's music lovers as, on the first night (13 January 1941), there were many empty seats in the Vic. Gerry Mulholland, the Express reviewer, wrote at some length as to the reasons why. He suggested that Burnley people did not tend to go out on Mondays and that the average working man preferred to save for a stall once a fortnight rather than go in the gallery two or three times a week. The first performance by the Old Vic on 27 January 1941 was 'Macbeth' and featured two boys from Burnley Grammar School. There was another poor attendance, which Mulholland blamed on the appalling weather conditions.
It took a while for the local people to become accustomed to the wealth of entertainment that became available in the town. However, after the 'Macbeth' review of 27 January, there was no mention of poor attendances. The review of 'Twelfth Night', (performed on 5 February 1941) commented that the full house appreciated a production which was "as near perfection as possible". By 19 February 1941 Mulholland was implying that the Burnley audience was exceptional, as after a performance by the Anglo-Polish ballet, he claimed, "i venture to suppose that none has given them more pleasure and pride than their first performance in Burnley".
The last session before their return to London began on 17 June 1942, and it detaured 'Othello' and 'The Merry Wives of Windsor'. In one and a half years Burnley had seen some of the greatest talent in Britain. Such stars as Norman Evans, Sandy Poweel, the Western brothers, Tudor Davies and Joan Collier all appeared in the town. The visit of the Old Vicand Sadler's Wells had a great effect on the town. Their impact was outlined by occasional Express columnsit Frank D Lofthouse in the 1 March 1942 edition, when he enthused, "The visit to Burnley of the Old Vic and Sadler's Wells artistes is of more significance than the wealth of amusement and interest presented to us. These are an emotionally and intellectually liberated people, and the sight, sound and psychology of our cosmopolitan visitors has done more than just aroused our appreciation of artistry, it has also assisted some of our more artistically inclined people a little further along the path of liberation by providing a kind of food too long withheld from us". Ironically, it took a war to bring this entertainment to the town.
-
• #72
erasers/ rubbers are an effective trainer / suede cleaner.
The white erasers do a good job removing grime from midsoles and general dirty marks on trainers. -
• #73
following a chat whilst out cycling with a mate, who suffered a deep knife cut to his hand from modelmaking a few weeks ago. he used superglue to hold his wound together before heading to A&E. the nurse told him that he did the right thing.. which led me to find this on the interwebz
-
• #74
https://rushkult.com/eng/scubamagazine/things-more-likely-to-kill-you-than-a-shark/?amp=1
Today’s tea break discussion.. coconuts, deer and vending machines
-
• #75
My daughter delights in telling me that toddlers with guns kill more people each year than sharks do.
Is it the sign of a good cover if you don’t realise it’s actually a cover of another song that you are also aware of and listen to? Or is it a bad thing for a cover to be re-stylised in such a way that to a listener it feels like nothing of the original actually remains despite some of the elements still being present? Or can both be seen as a positive depending on the circumstance?