-
• #3552
Actually the bmx bar makes a small frame useable for me, I do have the original 531/501 stem and bars for if it goes back to an mtb, Really could do with a layback seatpost if it stays this way, as you can see the seat tube is quite upright, part of the design for the shorter customer it was aimed at originally...... the designers later went on and became islabikes.
-
• #3553
sorry? these were recalled? no idea...
-
• #3554
Love those 1/2 trac's! I remember a guy in Cardiff/South Wales had one and it looked super exotic, along with his mate on his Yeti Ultimate... You'll get lots of interest on Retrobike for selling that beauty! What size is it by the way? Doesn't look too big based on size of the head tube.
-
• #3555
That one isn't mine, I think it's a 19" seattube...
I'll get some photos soon and create an advert!
-
• #3556
Nope, the bonded coda magic ones had a dodgy batch, not these. Never. 100%.
Actually the bike is amazing! -
• #3557
Awesome!
-
• #3558
Nope, the bonded coda magic ones had a dodgy batch, not these. Never. 100%.
Actually the bike is amazing!If those are CT-90s. They were recalled.
-
• #3560
Ok, so it was the 1995MY FC-CT90 cranks that were affected. Nothing else.
One pic is the bikes coda chainset and the other from the 1995 Shimano brochure. I'd say they are not the same cranks. Easy enough to Google a few images instead of relying on an old recall article with no pics.Happy to be proved wrong, the model number will be stamped inside the DS arm.
2 Attachments
-
• #3561
And here is what's likely to be a FC-CT90 fitted to a very low end 'dale from 1995, notable for the very skinny arms (likely to have been the issue with the breakages).
1 Attachment
-
• #3562
You can see that the Altus crank has riveted / permanent fixings for the chainrings.
I’ve even got one of those crappy non removable chainring shimano cranks and the product code isn’t affected by the recall.
-
• #3563
cheers for the info @shawnb - great spot and knowledge! they are indeed the recalled FC-CT90's!
i guess this must make them incredibly rare and valuable since most were presumably recalled and destroyed?
anyway, the crank arms are proportionally skinny to my 11yr old daughter's legs, so hopefully able to withstand her max watts.
-
• #3564
I think this fits in a few places.
1 Attachment
-
• #3565
Very fit, peak functional.
-
• #3566
Are the Billy Bonker tyres any good for crusing around on?
-
• #3567
A mate of mine uses them and he likes them alot.
-
• #3568
I love a Schwalbe but i reckon Maxxis Dth are a better rolling cruiser tyre
-
• #3569
Is there a tyre width that is too big for a 17mm internal rim? I think prob not. My frame has around 70mm clearance.
-
• #3570
If this chart is right, you can get away with up to 50mm: https://images.app.goo.gl/J97oSj3bUgzJXJ769. I managed 2" tyres on an older bike (Schwalbe G-One Speeds on Mavic XM317s), and it was fine.
-
• #3571
17mm was the internal for the ubiquitous Mavic M231 back in the 90's and they were typically run with 2.1" (53mm) tyres (smokes, darts, porcs etc)
-
• #3572
I was thinking prob not and the whole "you'll die if you don't run wide rims with you 32 tyres" is a weird rodie thing.
-
• #3573
Thems are the rims I have.
-
• #3574
Just made an 11hr round trip to collect this rather tasty Trek 950 in lugged OX comp II tubing. Little bit of rust here and there but looks barely ridden. LX group and hubs.
1 Attachment
-
• #3575
Found another old photo, I think it was Malverns 1994
1 Attachment
Recall cranks?