-
• #24027
So future prorogs won't be more heavily scrutinized?
I imagine that unless future ones are limited to the 4-6 days then they'll be open to scrutiny if they fall close to significant events.
Boris could, probably, prorogue again today as long as it was to be back on 1st October or thereabouts. Because then it'd not have the effect of preventing parliament scrutinising the government.
There was the distinction made about it being the effect rather than intention to prevent scrutiny. So they didn't actually say that Boris did it to stop scrutiny. They said that because it had that effect then actually the intention was irrelevant. So they didn't need to rule on whether he lied to the Queen.
-
• #24028
Would be a long cab ride, he's in NYC. Which could prove interesting if PMQs happens tomorrow.
-
• #24029
he's in NYC
Presuming he's asleep at the mo. What news for him to wake up to!
-
• #24030
Wonder what Her Majesty's reaction was when she heard?
-
• #24031
Corbyn never hammers it home. He just said the court found that Johnson acted "wrongly".
How about "unlawfully", how saying we have a corrupt PM? How about about a nickname? "Il Douche"
-
• #24032
Wasn't this the speculation before today's decision anyway? I don't think it's a new suggestion.
-
• #24033
Here you go. She’s got a dry wit for sure.
1 Attachment
-
• #24034
I think Boris had until October 20th to resign or be sacked or murdered by a humiliated girlfriend to be the shortest-term PM ever.
-
• #24035
His birth place
-
• #24036
he's in NYC. Which could prove interesting if PMQs happens tomorrow
I can imagine he would quite like to be as far as he can from it, so another time zone will suit him fine!
-
• #24037
-
• #24038
Even The Thick of It didn't get this fucked up!
-
• #24039
He just said the court found that Johnson acted "wrongly".
How about "unlawfully",
That's exactly what I shouted at the radio when he said wrongly.
-
• #24040
Ace!
-
• #24041
Grieve on a second prorogation:
I would have thought that any attempt in proroguing parliament following this judgement for anything other than the four or five days to go between one session and another will immediately attract another court application, and this time in view of the supreme court judgment, there will be an immediate order that it is unlawful
It is a constitutional change, but it’s one, it seems to me, that came logically from the role parliament plays in a parliamentary-free democracy.
The idea that you can play fast and loose with parliament, just to nudge it to one side when it’s convenient for the executive to do so, is dead and buried for good.
(On the topic of idiotic Dunning–Kruger speculation in this thread this is what I guessed a few days ago)
-
• #24042
.
1 Attachment
-
• #24044
Location: Uxbridge
Hahaha!
-
• #24045
Enemies of de Pfeffel?
-
• #24047
So BoJo is staying in New York to apparently address the General Assembly meet with Trump and Varadkar and to try to drum up support for a US - UK trade deal.
I've got one small question; given that he has failed at everything he's done as PM and was already a bit of a laughing stock how does he think anyone is going to take him seriously?
-
• #24048
Looking at the Yougov polling for a post 31st Oct election (following an extension), its pretty much level 4 ways and that could be 50-70 lib dem +up to 50 bxp. Will be impossible to call what will happen.
-
• #24049
polling pretty meaningless until we are inside an election cycle. for example, all the scottish polls basically have the SNP sweeping every seat in the country - highly doubtful that will happen looking at the margins in some key seats
-
• #24050
I’m too sensitive to go check, but how are the Brexit media reacting?
1 Attachment
"Mr Johnson has already vowed not to resign from No 10 if he loses the case and is found to have misled Her Majesty - and will be considering whether he can legally defy the court and ask the Queen to prorogue Parliament again. "
From the Daily Mail article. What?