-
• #11577
Just needs a basket and a frame pump
-
• #11578
Oooh yeah. And some SPD sandals
-
• #11580
Triggered.
1 Attachment
-
• #11582
Reported for bullying.
-
• #11583
Just wait until he starts mtb'ing and then get your own back
-
• #11584
My current setup. Mainly commuting on it but getting some good weekend rides in just wish smaller gravel bikes didn't have to default as step-through design!
1 Attachment
-
• #11585
That’s “compact Geo” not “step through”, no?
Looks good nonetheless.
What’s the rational behind having a cage and pump mounted under the downtube when there isn’t one already mounted on top of it? -
• #11586
I'm being melodramatic...envious of taller people and their more traditional/horizontal top tubes! The pump is down there cos I wanted it out of the way. Normally use that cage for a tool bottle so guess the pairing made sense in my head.
-
• #11587
I’m looking into a new bike and need some advice please.
I currently own a Bowman Pilgrims Disc (the original version) which I use for commuting duties. At least I did, but I now no longer commute as I’m WFH for the foreseeable. So I thought I’d fit some gravel tyres to mix up my road miles with something a bit more adventurous. Specs said it’d take 32 tyres, so I bought some IRC knobbly 32’s and fitted them today. They don’t bloody fit as the clearances are too tight.
So, I’m now thinking of selling the Bowman and sourcing something that will do everything other than road miles. A commuter, tourer and gravel bike. It must run disc brakes and I’d like it to have mudguard mounts, rack mounts (not a deal breaker) and be able to run proper off road tyres (not sure what max clearance should be though). Frame material isn’t particularly important.
So, what should be on the shortlist and what key questions am I not asking?
Thanks in advance.
-
• #11588
Cue is in the thread name.
-
• #11589
Fair enough. I’m just having a read about them as we speak and they look good. I suppose I should have asked “other than the Arkose, what else should be on the shortlist?”
-
• #11590
A shortcoming a pal found recently when touring w/ arkose is the fork - not really suitable for load. Not saying don't get an arkose, just something to bear in mind
-
• #11591
not really suitable for load
Can you expand on this? Thanks
-
• #11592
In this case they wanted to mount cargo cages, it wasn't an option. Sorry, this was a lot more specific than "not suitable for load". I don't know how the fork fares with axle mounted racks or anything like that
-
• #11593
Good to know. Thanks
-
• #11594
If you want to run a front rack then a carbon fork isn’t the best option
-
• #11595
the only downsides of the arkose as far as I can glean are: difficult (impossible? nitto m18?) to mount a front rack due to fork; and, no bosses for top tube bag like you'd see in e.g. the open UP frameset and other gravel frames (this one is a minor minor issue)
get the arkose
-
• #11596
A 2nd hand steel fork (w/ a headset reducer i guess) if/when touring comes around won't be a huge outlay
-
• #11597
Ribble CGR was on my list.. ended up with a bargain Arkose
-
• #11598
Needs a 66º head angle, and 35mm stem with swept back drops then we're nearly there
-
• #11599
Vitus/wiggle bikes are also a good bargain option. Spare money for a more road worthy wheelset.
-
• #11600
Great. Thanks for all the suggestions, I’ll have a good read up.
no! bad!