-
• #8002
TT extensions missing, 9.5/10
-
• #8003
-
• #8004
wrong thread
-
• #8005
i think it's pretty evident amey doesn't know what this thread is for...
-
• #8006
Least its not English.
-
• #8007
-
• #8008
-
• #8009
:/ endless spacers. No love for that kind of inefficiency here.
-
• #8010
OTP bikes>>>>
-
• #8011
Soon there will be some excellent non otp builds, though mostly weight weenie anti porn
-
• #8012
The fork looks like it belongs to a different bike.
-
• #8013
Looks like they forgot the bottom bearing for weight-weenism.
-
• #8014
Offset by leaving lots of spacers on and fitting two cages.
-
• #8015
-
• #8016
Stem slamage is so done.
-
• #8017
That pulley makes the chainring look small
-
• #8018
Nah
-
• #8019
stopped looking in this thread because it was jokes but now i pop back in from.time to time because it's jokes.
maybe 1 bike in 30 achieves. all analysis miles wide of any mark. please.consider how your contributions reflect upon our community!
-
• #8020
You’ve got to remember this was posted on the first page. I recall there was briefly some sort of standard being upheld but it’s gone out of the window.
1 Attachment
-
• #8021
-
• #8022
One of the first British (See flag) Prob still the only one that should be here.
-
• #8023
you can expect teething problems on page one, but after 327 pages...
-
• #8024
thread title to be changed to confused.com
-
• #8025
10/10 for vexillogical pedantry
10/10.
Would crash.