-
• #2402
I bought one recently as new winter bike. Heavier than my Big Block but v comfortable and preferred the ride over the Cd Fer.
Would recommend
-
• #2403
Genesis Day One? (2015).
£150 over your budget though, and it's a singlespeed freehubs rather than a freewheel;
-
• #2404
What's the cose of a BB30 carbon frame from China these days? Surely someone like Dolan could put some canti mounts on a FXE and up the clearance a bit and sell it as a £300 frameset?
-
• #2405
A fair point, the FXE does make a great CX frame once you set it right at the end of the drop out.
long reach calipers not gonna work in a CX environment I gather? (I'm thinking Tektro R559)
-
• #2406
FGCX only like that though, which is a whole other niche.
-
• #2407
What's the the aversion to steel? Cheap alu is likely to have worse clearance and won't ride any better.
Thought about a caadx frame set? I think they're bb30.
-
• #2408
What's the the aversion to steel? Cheap alu is likely to have worse clearance and won't ride any better.
Mainly because it's likely to be a lots lighter to carry? I recall @Howard saying this a while ago.
Thought about a caadx frame set? I think they're bb30.
They are, but can't get them as frameset as far as I'm aware of.
-
• #2409
I don't like steel bikes, heavier and less stiff. It's probably irrational, but I'm sure there's other people out there who are put off the fact that all cheap SSCX options are steel, for there to be a market for an alu SSCX.
-
• #2410
I've found this for ghettos eccentric in a PF30 46mm shell (clarified after publishing):
http://www.bikerumor.com/2011/02/23/problem-solvers-bb30-eccentric-bottom-bracket-adapter/Does someone make an eccentric for BB30(non-Pressfit) 42mm shells?
-
• #2412
^^ As I see it the problem is that currently all the Alu SSCX options out there are so expensive you be better of buying chinese in terms of performance. Alu doesn't have "followers" like steel and so if often becomes a performance question but since you can save both weight and money by going carbon the place for it in the already nieche marked is slim.
-
• #2413
Go to mielec and tell them to use good/light tubing?
They make 29ers so strength and disc/canti mounts isn't a problem, and they're now able to use 1.5inch headtubes. Plus you can make custom geo, and it probably won't go north of £300
-
• #2414
Goes single speed then worries about the performance impact of an additional 300g?
-
• #2415
And it no longer go into OTP territory, which is the main problem of acquiring an alu SSCX.
-
• #2416
It's the flex that bothers me more than the weight. Like I said, probably irrational, but when I had a Pompino I never really enjoyed riding it cos it always felt really twangy under power.
-
• #2417
Exactly - horisontal dropouts on SSCX is so last year.
-
• #2418
n00b question - but if you want a alu SS frame, why not just use any old alu CX frame and a SS converter thing? You'll get better choice of wheels etc then too..
-
• #2419
Ugly and I find tensioners have a tendency to slip under high power.
-
• #2420
looks ok to me:
-
• #2421
Cyclocross is hella bumpy so you want to stay away from spring tensioners. Not being able to drop the chain is one of the mayor pluses of a proper sscx bike so you want to enforce that.
-
• #2422
Tensioner no but beer components BB or eccentric hub would be good.
-
• #2423
But tensioners work fine for SS mtb conversions ... I've used one before myself, and given it a pretty hard time - never dropped the chain.
-
• #2424
Mine occasionally slips when really giving it the beans going up steep bits. Once it slips on a ride it'll keep doing it until I retighten it, which isn't really feasible in a cross race.
-
• #2425
I find tensioners have a tendency to slip under high power.
So did I, until I took one link off the chain.
Huh, they changed it again, look like it's 531 after all, odd choice of tubing considering the TIG construction, you'd think they would use 631.