-
Looked to have the underside of one wing, darker than the other.
-
Oh, I guessed it was something non-standard.
Was it to make assessing the direction easier?
-
Was it to make assessing the direction easier?
Not sure. If I find the old ROC manuals they might indicate whether that was the primary purpose.
-
From teh web...
During the mid to late 1930s, Britain was engaged in the task of building the world's first integrated air defence system. A means of detecting enemy aircraft at a distance in the form of what is today called radar was developed together with a command and control system to pass the information gathered by the radar to the fighters whilst in the air.
One of the many problems of integrating this system was how to distinguish between friendly fighters and enemy aircraft from the ground. This was necessary to allow them to be tracked over land by the Observer Corps. The early Chain Home radar transmitted its signals through 360 degrees. In order for the radar operators to distinguish the direction that the enemy were coming from the inland 180 degrees had to be blocked out electronically. The result of this was that there was no radar coverage inland and all the plotting information which was required for a successful interception, such as the location of the fighters in relation to the raiders once they had crossed the coast, had to be obtained visually, by the Observer Corps.
The solution to the problem of distinguishing friendly fighters visually from the ground was originally suggested by the Commander in Chief of Fighter Command, Hugh Dowding. In May 1937, Dowding wrote to the Air Ministry suggesting that the undersides of fighter aircraft should be painted in such a way as to make them easily identifiable from the ground. He suggested that the underside of one of the lower mainplanes should be finished in silver dope and the other in dull black. By this means, however the arrangement was likely to be viewed, it would always present a characteristic part coloured appearance to the observer. After some consideration by the Air Ministry it was decided that the idea should be tried out and permission for trials to begin was granted in July 1937.
During October 1937 Dowding wrote to the Air Ministry to inform them of the results obtained from the experiment. Whilst doing so, he suggested that with production of the Hurricane gathering pace, the undersides of the wings of these aircraft should be finished black on the port side and white on the starboard. He also suggested that to make the marking as clear as possible, the aircraft identification numbers should be omitted from the wing under surfaces.
The Air Ministry agreed that some Hurricanes could be finished in this way for the purpose of a large scale service trial and wrote to Dowding during December 1937 to inform him of the decision. As production of the Hurricane was well advanced by this time, it had not been found possible to apply the marking to early production aircraft, but it was to be instituted as soon as possible without delaying production.
The Air Ministry felt that it could not agree to the omission of the serial number from the under surfaces of the wings believing they should be retained as a deterrent to unauthorised low flying as they almost always allowed the offending aircraft and therefore pilot to be identified.
Hawkers were informed in a letter dated 8 January 1938 that it was desired that the under surface of the port wing was to be finished in black and the starboard wing white, with the flaps and ailerons included in this colour scheme. The identification numbers on the starboard (white) side of the aircraft were to remain as they were at present, but those on the port (black) side were to be applied in white to be visible against the black background. Because the Air Ministry had not made it absolutely clear whether the outer wings only were to be black and white or whether the dividing line between the two colours should be on the centreline of the centre section, a sketch showing only the outer panels of the wings finished in black and white was submitted to the Air Ministry in January 1938 for their approval along with a quoted price of £5. 0. 0d. for each aircraft to be finished in this manner. When the Air Ministry raised no objections, this was how the aircraft left the production line.
In March 1938, the Air Ministry wrote to Fighter Command informing them that the serial numbers of the Hurricanes earmarked for the new under surface colour scheme were 11576 - L1625 and delivery was expected to commence before the end of the month.
Once these aircraft began to go into service during early April 1938, Fighter Command expressed a wish that all Spitfires and Hurricanes should be finished in this manner. However in June 1938, Dowding complained that the Hurricanes which had been delivered by that time had not been properly painted as he wished the black and white colours to cover the largest possible surface and to meet on the centreline. The Hurricanes supplied thus far had not been painted on the fuselage at all, leaving a silver strip between the black and white which caused the colours to blend into one another when seen from a distance, destroying the contrast. He also suggested that the roundels on the under surfaces of home defence fighter aircraft were no longer necessary as the black and white finish would act as sufficient identification from below and the roundels only served to break up the clean expanse of black and white which was being relied upon for recognition.
The suggestion that roundels be removed from the under surfaces of Home Defence Fighter aircraft was considered by the Air Ministry, which concluded that there was no legal reason why this could not be done and in August 1938, the Director of Operations and Intelligence, wrote to Fighter Command to inform them of the decision. It was however stated that the roundels must continue to be used in the Field Force fighter squadrons.Eventually Dowding’s nagging and complaining bore fruit and fighter aircraft were finished with the undersides painted black and white divided down the centre line of the fuselage. By the outbreak of war most anomalies had been corrected and the majority of fighter aircraft were painted in accordance to his wishes. This lasted until June 1940 when undersides were painted all over sky.
The actual colour used was not black, but Night. Night was not a true black as it contained Carbon Black and Ultramarine pigments. It was developed before the war as an anti-searchlight finish. The existing matt black paint used by the RAF contained only Carbon Black pigment which was too soft, the paint easily polishing to a glossy sheen. The Ultramarine was added to make the finish more durable, not to alter the colour.
On 6th June 1940 the Air Ministry sent Signal X915 which stated that all under surfaces of fighter aircraft were to be doped to Sky Type S. This was a new colour and supplies in quantity did not become available until the middle to end of August 1940. Other, similar, colours were substituted as well as self-mixed versions which resulted in a range of colour variations being seen. Which colours were used is often difficult to interpret from black and white photographs but there is archaeological evidence for individual aircraft that BBS 381 (1930) No1 Sky Blue and BSS 381 (1930) No 16 Eau de Nil were used as well as Sky Grey and an unidentified blue-grey colour. The S in type S means smooth. The rough finish of the original matt camouflage paints had been found to cause a loss of performance. Investigation founds that this was due to problems in application and not to the paint itself. In order to improve the finish of camouflage paints the RAE developed Type S paints. These simply had much finer ground pigments than found in normal paint. All camouflage colours were produced as Type S, not just Sky.
As the BoB was coming to an end a re-assessment was made by Fighter Command of its camouflage and markings in light of combat experience. There was a general consensus of opinion that favoured a return to the ‘black and white’ under surface finish. Fighter pilots had found it a useful means of immediately locating the position of friendly fighters above them. Although the black wing also identified RAF fighters to the enemy this slight disadvantage was accepted. The decision was taken to re-introduce the ‘black and white’ scheme throughout Fighter Command but because of the enormous amount of man hours involved in repainting it was agreed that painting the port wing black, leaving Sky on the rest of the under surfaces would suffice.
There is some indication that this measure was either seen at the time as being temporary or experimental or that there were reservations about it. The black (Night) paint specified for use was to DTD 441 standard. This was a matt finish distemper which could be applied by brush or spray. After drying at room temperature for two weeks it was to be readily removable with hot water leaving the surfaces uninjured.
After the ‘black’ port wing had been in use for several months signal A279 was sent by Fighter Command to the Air Ministry and all other Commands on 7th April 1941 notifying them that from dawn on 15th April (subsequently delayed until 22nd April) the ‘black’ marking would be removed from all port wing under sides of day fighters. The reason for the sudden change in policy is not known but may be due to the changing role of Fighter Command from a purely defensive force to a more aggressive one, undertaking mass formation ‘sweeps’ into enemy territory. In this context the black wing would have alerted ground observers as to the whereabouts of RAF fighters.
There were also other occurrences of painting the under surface of the port wing black as a temporary recognition feature. For example, Operation Spartan, Exercise Scorch.
-
Wasn't on this year but you might be able to spot that particular Spit in the 'Balbo' for 2019 Flying Legends Airshow below. (I was there)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4LCH5vh17Mo
I wouldn't be suprised if it was in this weekends Battle of Britain show too, also at Duxford.
https://www.iwm.org.uk/airshows/duxford-battle-of-britain-airshow/tickets
-
Interesting, thanks!
-
This take off is mad and makes me want to be a freight dog (start it at 5 mins)
https://youtu.be/O16Oqo51hI0?t=307
Not sure what the logic is in the slow inital climb other than showing off - can't help thinking if you took of like that at a lot of airlines you'd end up having to explain yourself to the management.
-
The slow climb is trading altitude for airspeed. By climbing slowly, the aircraft is accelerating quickly, allowing the pilot to pull back on the stick and climb like he did (doing the reverse trade).
One of the comments in the video said that the airlines boss was on board, so it could have been approved - if it was a regular flight though, I hope that any cargo was securely strapped down!
-
Yeah that's what I figured, but the risks of accelerating and doing the speed it was doing that close to the ground don't really seem worth it (at the risk of sounding boring, it was a cool stunt).
Cargo had been dropped off and this was the empty run back apparently. Not sure that climb would be possible with any real weight on board even with a comparatively overpowered MD80!
-
Pilot was acting out his F-16 fantasy
Reported for sexism... joke. Risky showing off, obviously it was a man. ;)
Do you think the MD80 has anything as advanced as strain gauges?! I like the joke in the comments on that video about them being fly by wire - some of the wires were 1/16", others were 1/2".
-
Most large commercial aircraft have strain gauges fitted, mostly on the undercarriage and wing boxes in case of heavy landings. I worked on a 737 that hit the deck so hard on landing (the pilot claimed wind shear) that the tops of the carriage legs almost ended up in the cabin. It was out of service for about three months.
Any aircraft could handle that rate of climb under power, it was well within limits obvs but Ops would normally take a very dim view of anyone pulling that kind of stunt, certainly the big carriers would stick you on the simulator for a month.Cables, not wires btw 🙂
-
I found this really interesting
Special Lecture: F-22 Flight Controls
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n068fel-W9I
gbj_tester
Scilly.Suffolk
Eseman
Ordinata
Fox
jj72
peter_h
sohi
atz
Brun
Yukirin
Ducky🦆
Manson7am
-
Post a reply
About
Plane / Planes / Aircraft / Aeroplane / Airplane appreciation
Posted by
@GA2G
Drove past Duxford earlier and a Spitfire was taking-off: I guess that's where it was headed.
It seemed as if it was flying straight at us! First time I have heard one IRL: the whistle made my hair stand on end
Looked to have the underside of one wing, darker than the other.