-
• #1527
Just read that the plating are titanium armour making it highly resistant to damage, pretty impressive stuff.
-
• #1528
It was called the Devils Cross I think. (Quick Google says yes) Mind you it was designed as a tank buster for an all-out European war so no wonder it was armoured to the hilt!
I have a it as a Hasegawa 1:72 kit, might have to put that next on the build list.
-
• #1529
It is slow doe B-) #datgatlinggun
-
• #1530
I remember reading about the A-10 "tank killer" as a kid and being amazed by it's reputed low speed flying ability and it's survivability.
Everytime you'd read an article you would also get facts like "on a full burst (of the main gun) the aircraft would lose 10 knots of airspeed"All incredible, although I thought this when I was 10. Was it also known as the Warthog?
-
• #1531
Yeh always been A10 Warthog.
Actually, started as Powerglide for me. B-)
Sitting duck for Strike aircraft liek.
-
• #1532
Here's its freudian appendage with a Beetle for scale.
-
• #1533
My childish mind wants to see that turned towards the bug and fired.
Just for science n stuff.
-
• #1534
Everytime you'd read an article you would also get facts like "on a full burst (of the main gun) the aircraft would lose 10 knots of airspeed"
Am fairly confident that's a myth.
-
• #1535
BOOO. You just ruined it... like saying Santa's not real.
It does appear to be "hawg-wash"
-
• #1537
http://avherald.com/h?article=48188170&opt=0
A hail strike
-
• #1538
Jebus. I bet the wind noise in the cockpit was interesting with the nose caved-in like that. If the pilots could even hear anything over the sound of their bowls emptying.
-
• #1539
Did you follow the link and look at the photo of the windscreen?
That's pretty freaking scary. They then needed to land with zero visibility through the glass.
-
• #1540
Yeah, thats mental. Doing an instrument landing was probably ok but the circumstances obviously weren't at all.
-
• #1541
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VPGSzLhCKlc
This guy isn't going to grow old
-
• #1542
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G1NEOwDwapk
from outside -
• #1543
just like Beggar's Canyon back home
-
• #1544
^^ Not even in x-plane.
-
• #1545
i use to see a-10s based about an hour from where i live. they were last used in 2007 by the air national guard here in connecticut.
amphibians anyone? in middle school i use to draw my own. i had a long-range turbine engine powered passenger plane i called manatee. i was going to "revive" pan am and these would fly alongside grumman turbo mallards.
-
• #1546
-
• #1547
tbh i just recycled images from the first few pages
-
• #1548
Still.
Schneider Cup won us the war imo.
Nothing to do with Murica.
-
• #1550
I been watching Cars wid my boy too much ay. What a trophy too.
No, it doesn't have any more redundancy than anything else. What it has is a high excess of aerodynamic control, so it remains easily flyable with large area of control surface loss, plus a layout which makes it much less likely that both sides will be destroyed by a single weapon strike. There are a few other features of the fuel system and landing gear to make it more recoverable than a typical aircraft too.