-
• #35677
-
• #35678
I used to think those BMCs were so hot. They don't rub me up the right way at all anymore.
-
• #35679
I'm a fan, would love to give one a proper build...
-
• #35680
i only dislike the slack head tube angle
-
• #35681
Seriously? 73 degrees?
Too steep, and now too slack, this forum.
-
• #35682
slack angles (below 74°) looking disgusting on modern track frames.
but as we are in hhsb, we should stop discussing it here. -
• #35683
The headtube angle on that one doesn't look slack at all.
-
• #35684
Probably in reference to the smaller Track Machine that have slacker angle.
Good job BMC sorted out the geometry nowadays, funnily enough almost exactly how Jack Taylor* built their bicycles.
*all their frame, from track, crit, road to touring, town bike, etc. have the same head angle: 73 degrees, and sometime seat angle (71), the biggest variation is simply the rake/trail of the fork.
-
• #35685
yay slack headtube angles
-
• #35686
Like.
-
• #35687
the best way to treat your Ridley Oval 907C...
...by riding it off-road
http://vimeo.com/81316763
-
• #35688
That Ridley should pleased Eingang up some.
-
• #35689
That BMC look like exploding storm trooper bike out of return of the Jedi.
-
• #35690
Anybody now, which fork that is?
(I tried to ask in the Mielec thread, but I guess nobody knew)
it is a orlowski custom fork with superb sprint fork spec.
-
• #35691
re?
Think it was posted in Bike Porn
-
• #35692
hope not re.
could be in rats, but I think it fits here better
-
• #35693
Another. fucking. train.
-
• #35694
Is this on the continent?
-
• #35695
stockholm
-
• #35696
Ahhhh, Ta.
-
• #35697
no problem. he owns the ellsworth & martelly posted above too.
-
• #35698
apologies for crap phone camera ed.
-
• #35699
Trains!
-
• #35700
Nokia 3310?
re?